Robinson B J, Robinson G M, Maling T J, Johnson R H
Wellington School of Medicine, Wellington Hospital, New Zealand.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1989 Feb;13(1):95-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1989.tb00290.x.
The comparative efficacy of clonidine and chlormethiazole has been examined in the management of acute alcohol withdrawal. A double blind randomized study was conducted in consecutive patients admitted to a hospital detoxification unit. Patients were assessed regularly by a standard alcohol withdrawal rating-scale. Thirty-two patients received either clonidine or chlormethiazole in reducing dosages over 96 hr. All the patients receiving chlormethiazole had uneventful withdrawals. However, eight patients treated with clonidine were withdrawn from the trial due to hallucinations (two), seizures (two), symptomatic orthostatic hypotension (three) or drowsiness (one), indicating that clonidine is less effective than chlormethiazole in the prevention of the major manifestations of alcohol withdrawal.
已对可乐定和氯美噻唑在急性酒精戒断治疗中的疗效进行了比较。对一家医院戒毒科收治的连续患者进行了一项双盲随机研究。通过标准的酒精戒断评分量表定期对患者进行评估。32名患者在96小时内接受了逐渐减量的可乐定或氯美噻唑治疗。所有接受氯美噻唑治疗的患者戒断过程平稳。然而,8名接受可乐定治疗的患者因幻觉(2例)、癫痫发作(2例)、症状性直立性低血压(3例)或嗜睡(1例)而退出试验,这表明可乐定在预防酒精戒断的主要表现方面不如氯美噻唑有效。