• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院前心室颤动中肾上腺素与甲氧明的随机研究。

Randomized study of epinephrine versus methoxamine in prehospital ventricular fibrillation.

作者信息

Olson D W, Thakur R, Stueven H A, Thompson B, Gruchow H, Hendley G E, Hargarten K M, Aprahamian C

机构信息

Section of Trauma and Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Mar;18(3):250-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80408-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80408-1
PMID:2646997
Abstract

Experimental data suggest that a pure alpha-agonist, such as methoxamine, may improve the outcome of patients in ventricular fibrillation. A double-blind, randomized, prospective study was conducted in a paramedic system comparing the use of methoxamine with epinephrine in enhancing conversion of ventricular fibrillation while otherwise following American Heart Association protocols. One hundred two patients in ventricular fibrillation not responding to initial defibrillations with a pulsatile rhythm were randomized into one of two groups, each containing 51 patients. Equipressor doses of epinephrine (0.5 mg) and methoxamine (5 mg) were given intravenously and repeated according to American Heart Association guidelines. The mean age, sex ratio, and mean paramedic response times were comparable for the two groups. The mean time at scene until conversion was 22 +/- 10 minutes for methoxamine and 17 +/- 7 minutes for epinephrine (P = NS). The methoxamine group received 3.1 +/- 1.4 doses as compared with 2.8 +/- 1.3 doses for the epinephrine group (P = NS). Conversion rate, defined as the percentage of patients who developed a pulse during resuscitation, was 27.5% for the methoxamine group and 49.0% for the epinephrine group (P less than or equal to .03). Successful resuscitation, defined as the conveyance of a patient to an emergency department with a pulse and rhythm, was 17.7% for the methoxamine group and 39.2% for the epinephrine group (P less than or equal to .02). Save rate, defined as the percentage of patients discharged alive after hospitalization, was 7.8% for the methoxamine group and 19.6% for the epinephrine group (P less than or equal to .07).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

实验数据表明,一种纯α受体激动剂,如甲氧明,可能会改善室颤患者的预后。在一个护理急救系统中进行了一项双盲、随机、前瞻性研究,比较了甲氧明与肾上腺素在促进室颤转复方面的作用,同时遵循美国心脏协会的方案。102例对初始除颤无反应且无脉搏节律的室颤患者被随机分为两组,每组51例。按照美国心脏协会指南静脉给予等量的肾上腺素(0.5毫克)和甲氧明(5毫克),并重复给药。两组的平均年龄、性别比例和护理急救平均反应时间具有可比性。甲氧明组从到达现场到转复的平均时间为22±10分钟,肾上腺素组为17±7分钟(P=无统计学意义)。甲氧明组接受3.1±1.4次给药,而肾上腺素组为2.8±1.3次给药(P=无统计学意义)。转复率定义为复苏期间出现脉搏的患者百分比,甲氧明组为27.5%,肾上腺素组为49.0%(P≤0.03)。成功复苏定义为将有脉搏和节律的患者转运至急诊科,甲氧明组为17.7%,肾上腺素组为39.2%(P≤0.02)。挽救率定义为住院后存活出院的患者百分比,甲氧明组为7.8%,肾上腺素组为19.6%(P≤0.07)。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Randomized study of epinephrine versus methoxamine in prehospital ventricular fibrillation.院前心室颤动中肾上腺素与甲氧明的随机研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Mar;18(3):250-3. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80408-1.
2
The effect of epinephrine versus methoxamine on regional myocardial blood flow and defibrillation rates following a prolonged cardiorespiratory arrest in a swine model.在猪模型中,长时间心肺骤停后肾上腺素与甲氧明对局部心肌血流和除颤率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 1987 Sep;5(5):362-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90382-2.
3
A comparison of epinephrine and methoxamine for resuscitation from electromechanical dissociation in human beings.肾上腺素与甲氧明用于人类电机械分离复苏的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 1988 May;17(5):443-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(88)80233-6.
4
The effects of methoxamine and epinephrine on survival and regional distribution of cardiac output in dogs with prolonged ventricular fibrillation.甲氧明和肾上腺素对长时间心室颤动犬存活率及心输出量区域分布的影响。
Chest. 1990 Oct;98(4):999-1005. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.4.999.
5
Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.院外心室颤动患者肾上腺素与血管加压素的随机对照研究。
Lancet. 1997 Feb 22;349(9051):535-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)80087-6.
6
Methoxamine versus epinephrine on regional cerebral blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.心肺复苏期间甲氧明与肾上腺素对局部脑血流的影响
Crit Care Med. 1987 Jul;15(7):682-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198707000-00011.
7
A randomized, double-blind comparison of methoxamine and epinephrine in human cardiopulmonary arrest.甲氧明与肾上腺素用于人类心肺复苏的随机双盲比较
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Aug;152(2):519-23. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633701.
8
Treatment of prolonged ventricular fibrillation. Immediate countershock versus high-dose epinephrine and CPR preceding countershock.
Circulation. 1992 Jan;85(1):281-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.1.281.
9
[Pharmacotherapy of ventricular fibrillation. A prospective study in an emergency medical service].[心室颤动的药物治疗。在紧急医疗服务中的一项前瞻性研究]
Anaesthesist. 1991 Mar;40(3):172-9.
10
Epinephrine versus methoxamine in survival postventricular fibrillation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs.肾上腺素与甲氧明对犬心室颤动后存活及心肺复苏的影响
Crit Care Med. 1989 Dec;17(12):1310-3. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198912000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Drugs for Out-of-hospital, Shock-refractory Cardiac Arrest: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.比较院外、休克难治性心脏骤停的药物治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 19;22(4):834-841. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49590.
2
Adrenaline and vasopressin for cardiac arrest.用于心脏骤停的肾上腺素和血管加压素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 17;1(1):CD003179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003179.pub2.
3
Searching for the evidence in pre-hospital care: a review of randomised controlled trials. On behalf of the Ambulance Response Time Sub-Group of the National Ambulance Advisory Committee.在院前急救中寻找证据:随机对照试验综述。代表国家救护车咨询委员会救护车反应时间分组。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Jan;16(1):18-23. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.1.18.
4
High-dose epinephrine therapy and other advances in treating cardiac arrest.大剂量肾上腺素疗法及心脏骤停治疗的其他进展。
West J Med. 1990 Jun;152(6):697-703.