Vargas Luna José Luis, Krenn Matthias, Löfler Stefan, Kern Helmut, Cortés R Jorge A, Mayr Winfried
Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
Artif Organs. 2015 Oct;39(10):868-75. doi: 10.1111/aor.12623.
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an established method for functional restoration of muscle function, rehabilitation, and diagnostics. In this work, NMES was applied with surface electrodes placed on the anterior thigh to identify the main differences between current-controlled (CC) and voltage-controlled (VC) modes. Measurements of the evoked knee extension force and the myoelectric signal of quadriceps and hamstrings were taken during stimulation with different amplitudes, pulse widths, and stimulation techniques. The stimulation pulses were rectangular and symmetric biphasic for both stimulation modes. The electrode-tissue impedance influences the differences between CC and VC stimulation. The main difference is that for CC stimulation, variation of pulse width and amplitude influences the amount of nerve depolarization, whereas VC stimulation is only dependent on amplitude variations for pulse widths longer than 150 μs. An important remark is that these findings are strongly dependent on the characteristics of the electrode-skin interface. In our case, we used large stimulation electrodes placed on the anterior thigh, which cause higher capacitive effects. The controllability, voltage compliance, and charge characteristics of each stimulation technique should be considered during the stimulators design. For applications that require the activation of a large amount of nerve fibers, VC is a more suitable option. In contrast, if the application requires a high controllability, then CC should be chosen prior to VC.
神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是一种用于肌肉功能恢复、康复和诊断的成熟方法。在这项工作中,将表面电极置于大腿前部施加NMES,以识别电流控制(CC)模式和电压控制(VC)模式之间的主要差异。在使用不同幅度、脉宽和刺激技术进行刺激期间,测量诱发的膝关节伸展力以及股四头肌和腘绳肌的肌电信号。两种刺激模式的刺激脉冲均为矩形对称双相脉冲。电极-组织阻抗会影响CC和VC刺激之间的差异。主要区别在于,对于CC刺激,脉宽和幅度的变化会影响神经去极化的程度,而对于脉宽大于150 μs的情况,VC刺激仅取决于幅度变化。需要注意的是,这些发现很大程度上取决于电极-皮肤界面的特性。在我们的案例中,我们使用了置于大腿前部的大型刺激电极,这会产生更高的电容效应。在设计刺激器时,应考虑每种刺激技术的可控性、电压顺应性和电荷特性。对于需要激活大量神经纤维的应用,VC是更合适的选择。相比之下,如果应用需要高可控性,那么应优先选择CC而非VC。