Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501 Sur, 64849, Monterrey, Mexico.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018 Dec;56(12):2213-2219. doi: 10.1007/s11517-018-1851-y. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
There is multiple evidence in the literature that a sub-threshold pre-pulse, delivered immediately prior to an electrical stimulation pulse, can alter the activation threshold of nerve fibers and motor unit recruitment characteristics. So far, previously published works combined monophasic stimuli with sub-threshold depolarizing pre-pulses (DPPs) with inconsistent findings-in some studies, the DPPs decreased the activation threshold, while in others it was increased. This work aimed to evaluate the effect of DPPs during biphasic transcutaneous electrical stimulation and to study the possible mechanism underlying those differences. Sub-threshold DPPs between 0.5 and 15 ms immediately followed by biphasic or monophasic pulses were administered to the tibial nerve; the electrophysiological muscular responses (motor-wave, M-wave) were monitored via electromyogram (EMG) recording from the soleus muscle. The data show that, under the specific studied conditions, DPPs tend to lower the threshold for nerve fiber activation rather than elevating it. DPPs with the same polarity as the leading phase of biphasic stimuli are more effective to increase the sensitivity. This work assesses for the first time the effect of DPPs on biphasic pulses, which are required to achieve charge-balanced stimulation, and it provides guidance on the effect of polarity and intensity to take full advantage of this feature. Graphical abstract In this work, the effect of sub-threshold depolarizing pre-pulses (DPP) is investigated in a setup with transcutaneous electrical stimulation. We found that, within the tested 0-15 ms DPP duration range, the DPPs administered immediately before biphasic pulses proportionally increase the nerve excitability as visible in the M-waves recorded from the soleus muscle. Interestingly, these findings oppose published results, where DPPs, administered immediately before monophasic stimuli via implanted electrodes, led to decrease of nerve excitability.
文献中有多项证据表明,在电刺激脉冲之前立即施加亚阈前脉冲可以改变神经纤维的激活阈值和运动单位募集特征。到目前为止,以前的出版物将单相刺激与亚阈去极化前脉冲 (DPP) 结合使用,但结果不一致——在一些研究中,DPP 降低了激活阈值,而在其他研究中则增加了激活阈值。本工作旨在评估 DPP 在双相经皮电刺激过程中的作用,并研究这些差异的潜在机制。亚阈 DPP 持续 0.5 至 15ms,紧随双相或单相脉冲之后施加于胫神经;通过从比目鱼肌记录肌电图 (EMG) 来监测电生理肌肉反应(运动波,M 波)。数据表明,在特定研究条件下,DPP 倾向于降低神经纤维激活的阈值,而不是升高阈值。与双相刺激的先导相极性相同的 DPP 更有效地提高了敏感性。本工作首次评估了 DPP 对双相脉冲的影响,双相脉冲是实现电荷平衡刺激所必需的,并为极性和强度的影响提供了指导,以充分利用这一特性。 摘要 在这项工作中,研究了在经皮电刺激设置中亚阈去极化前脉冲 (DPP) 的作用。我们发现,在测试的 0-15ms DPP 持续时间范围内,双相脉冲之前立即施加的 DPP 成比例地增加了神经兴奋性,这在从比目鱼肌记录的 M 波中可见。有趣的是,这些发现与之前的研究结果相反,之前的研究结果表明,通过植入电极立即在单相刺激之前施加 DPP 会导致神经兴奋性降低。