Atkinson K, Downs K, Ashby M, Dodds A, Concannon A, Biggs J
Department of Hematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1989 Jan;4(1):23-7.
An analysis of the rate of leukocyte reconstitution in 164 recipients of HLA-identical sibling marrow transplants showed two factors to be independently influential. These were the underlying diagnosis and the type of prophylactic regimen used to minimize the risk of graft-versus-host disease. Patients with severe aplastic anemia had a faster rate of reconstitution of the total white blood cell count to levels of both 500 and 1000 x 10(6)/l than patients with acute non-lymphoblastic leukemia (ANL), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), however, did not show a faster rate of reconstitution of blood neutrophils. As well as being slower than patients with SAA for total leukocyte reconstitution, patients with CML were slower than patients with ANL and ALL in attaining a neutrophil count of 500 x 10(6)/l, and slower than patients with ANL in attaining a neutrophil count of 1000 x 10(6)/l. Patients given cyclosporin as the sole immunosuppressant prophylactic regimen post-transplant had faster reconstitution to total leukocyte counts of 500 and 1000 x 10(6)/l and to neutrophils of 1000 x 10(6)/l than patients given methotrexate alone, methotrexate and cyclosporin, or cyclosporin and T cell depletion of the donor marrow. No other factors (including the pretransplant preparative regimen) were significant in influencing the rate of leukocyte or neutrophil reconstitution. When only patients given cyclosporin were analysed, those with severe aplastic anemia continued to show a faster rate of leukocyte reconstitution to WBC 500 x 10(6)/l compared to patients with ANL, ALL or CML, and a faster rate to WBC 1000 x 10(6)/l than patients with CML.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对164例接受 HLA 同型同胞骨髓移植患者的白细胞重建率进行分析后发现,有两个因素具有独立影响力。这两个因素分别是基础诊断和用于将移植物抗宿主病风险降至最低的预防性治疗方案类型。与急性非淋巴细胞白血病(ANL)、急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)或慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者相比,严重再生障碍性贫血患者的白细胞总数恢复至500和1000×10⁶/L水平的速度更快。然而,严重再生障碍性贫血(SAA)患者的血液中性粒细胞重建速度并未加快。与SAA患者相比,CML患者的白细胞总体重建速度较慢,且在达到500×10⁶/L的中性粒细胞计数方面比ANL和ALL患者慢,在达到1000×10⁶/L的中性粒细胞计数方面比ANL患者慢。移植后接受环孢素作为唯一免疫抑制预防性治疗方案的患者,其白细胞总数恢复至500和1000×10⁶/L以及中性粒细胞恢复至1000×10⁶/L的速度比单独使用甲氨蝶呤、甲氨蝶呤和环孢素或环孢素与供体骨髓T细胞清除联合使用的患者更快。没有其他因素(包括移植前预处理方案)对白细胞或中性粒细胞重建率有显著影响。当仅分析接受环孢素治疗的患者时,与ANL、ALL或CML患者相比,严重再生障碍性贫血患者的白细胞重建至白细胞计数500×10⁶/L的速度仍然更快,且与CML患者相比,重建至白细胞计数1000×10⁶/L的速度更快。(摘要截选至250字)