Clark Alexander J, Taenzer Paul, Drummond Neil, Spanswick Christopher C, Montgomery Lori S, Findlay Ted, Pereira John X, Williamson Tyler, Palacios-Derflingher Luz, Braun Ted
Pain Res Manag. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):288-92. doi: 10.1155/2015/345432. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
The impact of telephone consultations between pain specialists and primary care physicians regarding the care of patients with chronic pain is unknown.
To evaluate the impact of telephone consultations between pain specialists and primary care physicians regarding the care of patients with chronic pain.
Patients referred to an interdisciplinary chronic pain service were randomly assigned to either receive usual care by the primary care physician, or to have their case discussed in a telephone consultation between a pain specialist and the referring primary care physician. Patients completed a numerical rating scale for pain, the Pain Disability Index and the Short Form-36 on referral, as well as three and six months later. Primary care physicians completed a brief survey to assess their impressions of the telephone consultation.
Eighty patients were randomly assigned to either the usual care group or the standard telephone consultation group, and 67 completed the study protocol. Patients were comparable on baseline pain and demographic characteristics. No differences were found between the groups at six months after referral in regard to pain, disability or quality of life measures. Eighty percent of primary care physicians indicated that they learned new patient care strategies from the telephone consultation, and 97% reported that the consultation answered their questions and helped in the care of their patient.
Most primary care physicians reported that a telephone consultation with a pain specialist answered their questions, improved their patients' care and resulted in new learning. Differences in patient status compared with a usual care control group were not detectable at six-month follow-up.
While telephone consultations are clearly an acceptable strategy for knowledge translation, additional strategies may be required to actually impact patient outcomes.
疼痛专科医生与初级保健医生之间就慢性疼痛患者护理进行电话会诊的影响尚不清楚。
评估疼痛专科医生与初级保健医生之间就慢性疼痛患者护理进行电话会诊的影响。
被转诊至跨学科慢性疼痛服务机构的患者被随机分配,要么接受初级保健医生的常规护理,要么让疼痛专科医生与转诊的初级保健医生通过电话会诊讨论其病例。患者在转诊时、以及三个月和六个月后分别完成疼痛数字评定量表、疼痛残疾指数和简短健康调查问卷。初级保健医生完成一份简短调查,以评估他们对电话会诊的印象。
80名患者被随机分配至常规护理组或标准电话会诊组,67名患者完成了研究方案。患者在基线疼痛和人口统计学特征方面具有可比性。转诊六个月后,两组在疼痛、残疾或生活质量指标方面未发现差异。80%的初级保健医生表示他们从电话会诊中学到了新的患者护理策略,97%的医生报告称会诊解答了他们的问题并有助于他们对患者的护理。
大多数初级保健医生报告称,与疼痛专科医生进行电话会诊解答了他们的问题,改善了对患者的护理并带来了新的知识。在六个月的随访中,与常规护理对照组相比,患者状况的差异并不明显。
虽然电话会诊显然是一种可接受的知识转化策略,但可能还需要其他策略才能真正影响患者的治疗结果。