De Groot Barry J A, Van den Bos Kees P, Van der Meulen Bieuwe F, Minnaert Alexander E M G
1 University of Groningen, Netherlands.
J Learn Disabil. 2017 Mar/Apr;50(2):168-179. doi: 10.1177/0022219415609186. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
Employing a large sample of children from Dutch regular elementary schools, this study assessed the contributing and discriminating values of reading disability (RD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) to two types of phonological processing skills, phonemic awareness (PA) and rapid automatized naming (RAN). A second objective was to investigate whether comorbidity of RD and ADHD should be considered as an additive phenomenon as to RAN and PA. A total of 1,262 children, aged 8 to 13 years, were classified as RD ( n = 121), ADHD ( n = 17), comorbid (RD+ADHD; n = 16), or control ( n = 1,108). Phonological processing was assessed by standardized tests of PA and RAN. Disability groups were compared to each other and contrasted to the control group. Although results indicate substantial effects for all three disability groups on both types of phonological processing, and the RAN/PA compound measure in particular, effect sizes were considerably larger for the RD groups, as compared to the ADHD-only group. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
本研究以荷兰普通小学的大量儿童为样本,评估了阅读障碍(RD)和注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)对两种语音处理技能,即语音意识(PA)和快速自动命名(RAN)的影响及区分价值。第二个目标是调查RD和ADHD的共病在RAN和PA方面是否应被视为一种叠加现象。共有1262名8至13岁的儿童被分为RD组(n = 121)、ADHD组(n = 17)、共病组(RD + ADHD;n = 16)或对照组(n = 1108)。通过PA和RAN的标准化测试评估语音处理能力。对残疾组之间以及与对照组进行比较。尽管结果表明所有三个残疾组对两种语音处理类型,特别是RAN/PA复合测量都有显著影响,但与仅患ADHD的组相比,RD组的效应量要大得多。文中讨论了理论和实际意义。