Suppr超能文献

复发性上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌和腹膜癌二次减瘤手术选择标准的建议

Proposal for selection criteria of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers.

作者信息

Minaguchi Takeo, Satoh Toyomi, Matsumoto Koji, Sakurai Manabu, Ochi Hiroyuki, Onuki Mamiko, Oki Akinori, Yoshikawa Hiroyuki

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;21(3):573-9. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0910-8. Epub 2015 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer are yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to propose the selection criteria through identifying predictive factors for successful SCS.

METHODS

All patients who underwent SCS for recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers between 1982 and 2012 at our institution were identified through our database. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival after SCS was examined by the grouping model based on the number of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

We performed SCS in 80 consecutive patients, 48 (60 %) of whom achieved complete resection. Complete/incomplete resection significantly influenced survival (median 65 vs. 26 months; p = 0.0005). Among favorable prognostic factors determined before SCS, treatment-free interval >12 months, absent distant metastasis, solitary disease, and performance status 0 were independently associated with better survival (p = 0.0009, 0.00003, 0.0004, and 0.015, respectively). Patients with 3-4 of those factors had better survival than those with 2 or 0-1 factors (median 79, 26, and 19 months; p < 0.00001 and <0.0000000001, respectively). Complete resection of visible tumors was achieved in 79 % of patients with 3-4 factors, in 40 % of those with 2 factors, and in 33 % of those with 0-1 factor. Importantly, even when tumor removal was incomplete at SCS, median survival of patients with 3-4 factors was still quite favorable (83 vs. 67.5 months for complete/incomplete resection, respectively), while those of patients with 2 factors (41 vs. 25 months) and 0-1 factor (19 vs. 19 months) were not.

CONCLUSION

We strongly recommend SCS for patients with 3-4 of the above favorable factors at recurrence. As for patients with 2 factors, SCS may be considered if complete resection is expected to be achieved. Prospective studies are warranted to validate our proposal.

摘要

背景

复发性卵巢癌二次细胞减灭术(SCS)的选择标准尚未明确。本研究旨在通过确定SCS成功的预测因素来提出选择标准。

方法

通过我们的数据库识别出1982年至2012年间在我们机构接受复发性上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌和腹膜癌SCS治疗的所有患者。在单因素和多因素分析中评估潜在的预后因素。通过基于预后因素数量的分组模型检查SCS后的生存率。

结果

我们连续对80例患者进行了SCS,其中48例(60%)实现了完全切除。完全/不完全切除显著影响生存率(中位生存期分别为65个月和26个月;p = 0.0005)。在SCS前确定的有利预后因素中,无治疗间隔>12个月、无远处转移、孤立性疾病和体能状态0与更好的生存率独立相关(分别为p = 0.0009、0.00003、0.0004和0.015)。具有3 - 4个这些因素的患者比具有2个或0 - 1个因素的患者生存率更高(中位生存期分别为79个月、26个月和19个月;p分别<0.00001和<0.0000000001)。在具有3 - 4个因素的患者中,79%实现了可见肿瘤的完全切除,在具有2个因素的患者中为40%,在具有0 - 1个因素的患者中为33%。重要的是,即使在SCS时肿瘤切除不完全,具有3 - 4个因素的患者的中位生存期仍然相当可观(完全/不完全切除分别为83个月和67.5个月),而具有2个因素的患者(41个月对25个月)和0 - 1个因素的患者(19个月对19个月)则不然。

结论

我们强烈推荐对复发时具有上述3 - 4个有利因素的患者进行SCS。对于具有2个因素的患者,如果预计能实现完全切除,则可考虑SCS。有必要进行前瞻性研究来验证我们的提议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验