• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药业在产品开发方面的成功——生物技术是否改变了产品开发与损耗的模式。

Pharma Success in Product Development—Does Biotechnology Change the Paradigm in Product Development and Attrition.

作者信息

Evens Ronald P

出版信息

AAPS J. 2016 Jan;18(1):281-5. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9833-6.

DOI:10.1208/s12248-015-9833-6
PMID:26475480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4706289/
Abstract

The biotechnology segment of the overall biopharma industry has existed for only about 40–45 years, as a driver of new product development. This driving force was initiated with the FDA approval of recombinant human insulin in 1982, originating from the Genentech company. The pharma industry in the early years of 1970s and 1980s engaged with biotechnology companies only to a small extent with their in-licensing of a few recombinant molecules, led by Roche, Eli Lilly, and Johnson and Johnson. However, subsequently and dramatically over the last 25 years, biotechnology has become a primary driver of product and technology innovation and has become a cornerstone in new product development by all biopharma companies. This review demonstrates these evolutionary changes regarding approved products, product pipelines, novelty of the products, FDA approval rates, product sales, financial R&D investments in biotechnology, partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, and patent issues. We now have about 300 biotechnology products approved in USA covering 16 medical disciplines and about 250 indications, with the engagement of 25 pharma companies, along with their biotechnology company innovators and partners. The biotechnology pipeline involves over 1000 molecules in clinical trials, including over 300 molecules associated with the top 10 pharma companies. Product approval rates by the FDA for biotechnology products are over double the rate for drugs. Yes, the R&D paradigm has changed with biotechnology now as one of the major focuses for new product development with novel molecules by the whole biopharma industry.

摘要

作为新产品开发的驱动力,整个生物制药行业中的生物技术领域仅存在了约40 - 45年。这一驱动力始于1982年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准基因泰克公司生产的重组人胰岛素。在20世纪70年代和80年代早期,制药行业与生物技术公司的合作程度有限,仅对少数重组分子进行了引进许可,罗氏、礼来以及强生公司处于主导地位。然而,在随后的25年里,生物技术发生了巨大变化,已成为产品和技术创新的主要驱动力,并成为所有生物制药公司新产品开发的基石。本综述展示了在已批准产品、产品管线、产品新颖性、FDA批准率、产品销售、对生物技术的研发资金投入、合作关系、并购以及专利问题等方面的这些演变。目前,美国已批准约300种生物技术产品,涵盖16个医学学科和大约250种适应症,涉及25家制药公司及其生物技术创新公司和合作伙伴。生物技术产品管线中有1000多种分子正在进行临床试验,其中包括与排名前十的制药公司相关的300多种分子。FDA对生物技术产品的批准率是药物批准率的两倍多。的确,随着生物技术如今成为整个生物制药行业开发新型分子新产品的主要重点之一,研发模式已经发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Pharma Success in Product Development—Does Biotechnology Change the Paradigm in Product Development and Attrition.制药业在产品开发方面的成功——生物技术是否改变了产品开发与损耗的模式。
AAPS J. 2016 Jan;18(1):281-5. doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9833-6.
2
Overcoming the obstacles in the pharma/biotech industry: 2008 update.克服制药/生物技术行业的障碍:2008年最新情况
Drug News Perspect. 2009 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-51. doi: 10.1358/dnp.2009.22.1.1303817.
3
[Early achievements of the Danish pharmaceutical industry--8. Lundbeck].[丹麦制药行业的早期成就——8. 灵北公司]
Theriaca. 2016(43):9-61.
4
Lasofoxifene: CP 336156, CP-336156.拉索昔芬:CP 336156,CP-336156。
Drugs R D. 2005;6(1):56-60. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200506010-00008.
5
Overcoming further challenges in the pharma/biotech industry: 2007 update.克服制药/生物技术行业的更多挑战:2007年最新情况
Drug News Perspect. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):44-58.
6
Overcoming the challenges in the pharma/biotech industry.克服制药/生物技术行业的挑战。
Drug News Perspect. 2007 Jan-Feb;20(1):57-68.
7
Erlotinib: CP 358774, NSC 718781, OSI 774, R 1415.厄洛替尼:CP 358774、NSC 718781、OSI 774、R 1415。
Drugs R D. 2003;4(4):243-8. doi: 10.2165/00126839-200304040-00006.
8
Late-stage Product Development and Approvals by Biotechnology Companies After Initial Public Offering, 1997-2016.1997年至2016年生物技术公司首次公开募股后的后期产品开发与批准情况
Clin Ther. 2021 Jan;43(1):156-171.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
9
The biotechnology innovation machine: a source of intelligent biopharmaceuticals for the pharma industry--mapping biotechnology's success.生物技术创新机器:制药行业智能生物制药的源泉——绘制生物技术的成功图谱。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;95(5):528-32. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.14. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
The moderating role of absorptive capacity and the differential effects of acquisitions and alliances on Big Pharma firms' innovation performance.吸收能力的调节作用以及收购与联盟对大型制药公司创新绩效的不同影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0172488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172488. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver-on-a-chip: Considerations, advances, and beyond.芯片上的肝脏:考量因素、进展及未来展望
Biomicrofluidics. 2022 Nov 8;16(6):061502. doi: 10.1063/5.0106855. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
A computational model for GPCR-ligand interaction prediction.一种用于预测 GPCR-配体相互作用的计算模型。
J Integr Bioinform. 2020 Dec 29;18(2):155-165. doi: 10.1515/jib-2019-0084.
3
A qualitative study of biosimilar manufacturer and regulator perceptions on intellectual property and abbreviated approval pathways.一项关于生物类似药制造商和监管机构对知识产权及简化审批途径看法的定性研究。
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Nov;38(11):1253-1256. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0717-7.
4
Rational optimization of a monoclonal antibody improves the aggregation propensity and enhances the CMC properties along the entire pharmaceutical process chain.单克隆抗体的合理优化可提高其聚集倾向,并增强整个药物工艺链中的 CMC 性质。
MAbs. 2020 Jan-Dec;12(1):1787121. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1787121.

本文引用的文献

1
Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets.联合癌症免疫疗法和新的免疫调节靶点。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Aug;14(8):561-84. doi: 10.1038/nrd4591.
2
The evolution of biotechnology and its impact on health care.生物技术的发展及其对医疗保健的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Feb;34(2):210-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1023.
3
Regulatory watch: Innovation in biologic new molecular entities: 1986-2014.监管观察:生物新分子实体的创新:1986 - 2014年
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Feb;14(2):83. doi: 10.1038/nrd4535.
4
The biotechnology innovation machine: a source of intelligent biopharmaceuticals for the pharma industry--mapping biotechnology's success.生物技术创新机器:制药行业智能生物制药的源泉——绘制生物技术的成功图谱。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 May;95(5):528-32. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2014.14. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
5
Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs.研究性药物的临床开发成功率。
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;32(1):40-51. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2786.
6
Trends in risks associated with new drug development: success rates for investigational drugs.新药研发相关风险趋势:研究药物的成功率。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;87(3):272-7. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.295. Epub 2010 Feb 3.