The article series provides a written and pictorial account of the Danish pharmaceutical industry's products from their introduction until about 1950. Part 8 deals with products from Lundbeck. Lundbeck which today is known as a considerable international pharmaceutical company could in 2015 celebrate its 100 years' jubilee. Among the early Danish medicinal companies H. Lundbeck & Co. is in many ways an exception as the company was not originally established as a pharmaceutical company. Not until several years after the foundation the company began to import foreign ready-made medicinal products and later-on to manufacture these medicinal products in own factory and even later to do research and development of own innovative products. When Lundbeck was established in 1915 several Danish medicinal companies, not only the well-known such as Alfred Benzon and Løvens kemiske Fabrik (LEO Pharma), but also Skelskør Frugtplantage, Ferrin and Ferraton, had emerged due to the respective enterprising pharmacy owners who had expanded their traditional pharmacy business and even with commercial success. Other medicinal companies, such as C.R. Evers & Co., Leerbeck & Holms kemiske Fabriker, Chr. F. Petri, Erslevs kemiske Laboratorium, Edward Jacobsen, Th. Fallesen-Schmidt, and yet other companies which were named after the founder had all been established by pharmacists with the primary intention to manufacture and sell medicinal products. Also for the limited companies Medicinalco, Ferrosan, Pharmacia, and GEA the primary task was to manufacture and sell medicinal products, and also in these companies pharmacists were involved in the foundation. Not until 1924, fully 9 years after the foundation, Lundbeck started to be interested in medicinal products and initiated import and sale of foreign medicinal products manufactured by a.o. German and French companies which had not established their own sales companies in Denmark. Almost all contemporary Danish manufacturers of medicinal products could exclusively determine own proprietary names of the articles and could themselves make their own homogeneous and easily recognisable design, a.o. by frequent use of prefixes as Afa, Asa, Gea, Ido, Leo, and Meco which associated to for instance the company name. However, it goes without saying that Lundbeck had to market the articles in commission according to the different contracts with their partners. Consequently their range of products appeared heterogeneously. The international financial crisis and the consequent unemployment in the 1920s and 1930s had in Denmark a.o. resulted in national regulation in order to complicate import of ready-made goods and thus support the domestic manufacture of such articles. This was one of the reasons why Lundbeck decided to initiate its own manufacture of medicinal products in Denmark instead of continuing only with the import business which had been obstructed by the authorities. This article does not mention all Lundbeck's medicinal products which were marketed in Denmark until 1955 where a new Pharmacy Act came into force though undoubtedly a lot of interest can be written about all of them. The products mentioned in this article have been carefully selected, not only because they are representative for Lundbeck's development during the first decades, but also because the Danish Collection of the History of Pharmacy has acquired consumer packages of many of the articles. Several of these packages include patient information leaflets with an instruction for use and/or other information, and especially these leaflets represent a source material which has not previously been given much attention. It does not appear from the available source material whether these earliest medicinal products from Lundbeck were assembled in Danish packages on the production sites, or whether they were repacked in Copenhagen. It is not unlikely that the assembling originally was finalized abroad, and that instructions for the production of packaging material with Danish text were supplied by Lundbeck to the respective manufacturers. However, it is not unlikely either that the currency restrictions which were made after 1932 encouraged Lundbeck, where possible, first of all to import raw materials and bulk products and then manufacture the finished products in Valby. This was the case with Anusol, which Lundbeck certainly emphazised in the advertisement. It has to be pointed out that at that time there were no legal requirements regarding dating, neither of the user instructions nor of advertisements. Thus it is not due to mistakes or omissions made by Lundbeck that these materials are undated. The user instructions which Lundbeck had inserted in the packages were made and distributed at a time where no legal restrictions were in force neither regarding form nor content of such. The user instructions for products marketed after 1932 had probably been presented to the Pharmacopoeia Commission as this was statutory. It is, however, uncertain whether the Commission has dealt with the contents and the look of the user instructions. The most important task of the Commission was besides of the work with maintaining the Pharmacopoeia to look after the economic interests of the pharmacies so that only new drug substances could be marketed by the pharmaceutical industry, cf. below. In order to find out whether, and if so to which extent, the Pharmacopoeia Commission has been occupied in evaluating the informative and promoting printed matters of the industry, would require studies of the unprinted files of the Commission, and that is outside the scope of this article. At that time it was not against the law to inform in a user instruction that in case of a longer period of treatment, it would be more economical for the patient to buy a larger package. If you look at these patient information leaflets with today's eyes in the light of the present detailed, comprehensive and rigid regulations which the EU Commission has stated regarding patient information leaflets, you will find that Lundbeck's patient information leaflets were both simple and easy to read. On a free sample of Gelonida meant for the prescribing physician Lundbeck stated, besides of indication, dosage and warnings, also that the article was "Manufactured in Denmark". At that time it was not required to print information of production sites on packaging materials, however, it was not unusual to use this sales promoting claim in times of unemployment. In 1949 the original packaging material for Beatin was modified because certain text elements, the therapeutic indications were removed as it appeared that they since 1933 had violated the Pharmacy Act against advertisements for medicinal products aimed at the public. The packaging material for Beatin is a model example of the possibilities to combine practical information about the use of a medicinal product with sales claims in a reliable way. The above text modification and thus the legalisation of the packaging material took place upon request from the company as the violation of the advertising rules of the Pharmacy Act apparently had not resulted in any legal problems. Studies of unpublished files from the National Board of Health may possibly explain the background of this sequence of events, however, that is outside the scope of this article. The paragraph of the Pharmacy Act of 1932, stating that a medicinal product containing a common commodity as the active ingredient could not be marketed as a proprietary medicinal product, was meant to protect the pharmacies against the increasing competition from the industry. At first the paragraph did put a strain on the industry which from then on either had to manufacture own originator products or to copy other originator products without breaking patents. In the long run it has probably caused that not only Lundbeck, but also other Danish pharmaceutical companies became research-oriented and thus have been able to develop a relatively large number of originator products. In this context a product like Lucamid can hardly be regarded as an example of such a compulsory development of an originator product, an acetylsalicylic acid analogue. There were already such products on the market, but the wish to develop a better active ingredient has probably been bigger. From the three first editions of The Tariff of Medicines from 1935, 1937 and 1939 respectively it appears how Lundbeck's business within the area of medicines developed during the last half of the 1930s. In 1935 Lundbeck had placed 36 different medicinal products on the market, and all of them were in-licensing products. 4 years later, in 1939 Lundbeck had placed 40 different medicinal products on the market, and the number of in-licensing products had been reduced to 18 and 22 products were Lundbeck products. However, the increased focus on the development of own new medicinal products as Epicutan and Klianyl did not stop the in-licensing activities. Varex which Lundbeck brought on the market in 1942 came from a German pharmaceutical company with which Lundbeck had not previously collaborated. In Denmark Lundbeck had the intention to market 4 of Goedecke's 6 different medicinal products which all had Gelonida as part of the proprietary name. However, only one of these products got a longer life and with a simplified name, namely Gelonida. The fixed combination with three compounds of acetylsalicylic acid, phenacetin and codeine was without doubt effective, however, already at the end of the 1950s concern was raised about the safety of phenacetin. The Card Index of Medicines is a primary source of knowledge of how Lundbeck marketed the earliest medicinal products to the prescribing physicians. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)