Health Psychology Section, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; NIHR School for Primary Care Research and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre University of Manchester, UK.
NIHR School for Primary Care Research and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre University of Manchester, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 1;189:379-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Oct 3.
Collaborative care has proven efficacy in improving symptoms of depression, yet patients value improvements in their social function also. We used the World Health Organisation's International classification of functioning, disability, and health (WHO ICF) to robustly identify measures of social function and explored whether collaborative care interventions improve social functioning using meta-analysis.
We performed a secondary data analysis on studies identified from our previous Cochrane review of collaborative care interventions for depression and search update (December 2013). The WHO ICF framework was applied to identify studies that included self-report measures of social functioning. Outcomes were extracted at short-term (6 months) and medium-term (≥7 months) and analysed using random-effects meta-analysis. The relationship between improvements in depression outcomes and improvements in social functioning was also explored using bivarable meta-regression.
Eighteen trials were identified that measured social functioning and met our remaining inclusion criteria. Collaborative care was associated with small improvements in social functioning in the short (Standardised Mean Difference, SMD=0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.34) and medium term (SMD=0.19, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.29). Improvements in depressive symptoms were associated with moderate improvements in social function (ß=-0.55, 95% confidence interval -0.82 to -0.28) but cross-sectionally only.
The small number of studies (N=18) prevented more complex analyses to explore moderators of social functioning outcomes.
Collaborative care improves social functioning but the mechanisms through which this occurs are unknown. Future depression interventions need to consider a person's degree of social function equally alongside their depressive symptoms.
协作式护理已被证明能有效改善抑郁症状,但患者也重视社会功能的改善。我们使用世界卫生组织的国际功能、残疾和健康分类(WHO ICF)来全面识别社会功能的衡量指标,并通过荟萃分析探索协作式护理干预是否能改善社会功能。
我们对之前 Cochrane 协作式护理干预抑郁症的综述[1]及更新搜索(2013 年 12 月)中确定的研究进行了二次数据分析。WHO ICF 框架用于识别包括社会功能自评测量的研究。在短期(6 个月)和中期(≥7 个月)提取结局,并使用随机效应荟萃分析进行分析。还使用双变量荟萃回归探索改善抑郁结局与改善社会功能之间的关系。
确定了 18 项测量社会功能并符合我们其余纳入标准的试验。协作式护理与短期(标准化均数差,SMD=0.23,95%置信区间 0.12 至 0.34)和中期(SMD=0.19,95%置信区间 0.09 至 0.29)社会功能的小改善相关。抑郁症状的改善与社会功能的适度改善相关(ß=-0.55,95%置信区间 -0.82 至 -0.28),但仅为横截面相关。
研究数量较少(N=18),无法进行更复杂的分析来探索社会功能结局的调节因素。
协作式护理能改善社会功能,但发生机制尚不清楚。未来的抑郁症干预措施需要同等考虑患者的社会功能程度和抑郁症状。