Suppr超能文献

孤立性胰腺损伤:对一家一级创伤中心连续治疗的49例患者的分析。

Isolated pancreatic injuries: An analysis of 49 consecutive patients treated at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.

作者信息

Krige J E J, Kotze U K, Nicol A J, Navsaria P H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit and Trauma Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa.

Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit and Trauma Centre, Groote Schuur Hospital, Anzio Road, Observatory, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

J Visc Surg. 2015 Dec;152(6):349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study interrogated a large prospectively documented institutional database to determine morbidity and mortality after an isolated pancreatic injury (IPI).

METHOD

Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification and the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions. The degree of the pancreatic duct injury was graded using a modified Takishima duct injury classification. Primary endpoints were general and pancreas-specific morbidity and mortality.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-eight consecutive patients were treated between 1990 and 2014 for pancreatic injuries of whom 49 (median age: 30, range: 13-68 years, 41 men, blunt injuries: n=43) had an IPI. Thirty-four (70%) patients underwent urgent surgery, 20 of whom had a distal pancreatectomy and 14 had external drainage of the pancreatic injury. Fifteen (30%) patients presented with a non-resolving pancreatic pseudocyst or fistula; five had grade 4A or 4B ductal injuries and underwent surgery, 10 with 3A and 3B ductal injuries were successfully managed endoscopically. Fifty-five percent had postoperative morbidity. Two patients (4%) died of non-pancreatic-related causes.

CONCLUSION

While overall mortality is low after an IPI, morbidity is high. Two thirds of patients required operative intervention and one third were treated endoscopically. The degree of pancreatic ductal injury determined whether endoscopic intervention was effective.

摘要

背景

本研究对一个大型前瞻性记录的机构数据库进行了调查,以确定单纯胰腺损伤(IPI)后的发病率和死亡率。

方法

根据Clavien-Dindo分类和国际胰腺手术研究组(ISGPS)的定义对并发症进行分级。采用改良的Takishima导管损伤分类法对胰腺导管损伤程度进行分级。主要终点是总体和胰腺特异性发病率及死亡率。

结果

1990年至2014年间,连续448例患者接受了胰腺损伤治疗,其中49例(中位年龄:30岁,范围:13 - 68岁,男性41例,钝性损伤:n = 43)为单纯胰腺损伤。34例(70%)患者接受了急诊手术,其中20例行胰体尾切除术,14例行胰腺损伤外引流术。15例(30%)患者出现持续性胰腺假性囊肿或瘘;5例有4A或4B级导管损伤并接受了手术,10例3A和3B级导管损伤患者通过内镜成功治疗。55%的患者有术后并发症。2例(4%)患者死于非胰腺相关原因。

结论

虽然单纯胰腺损伤后总体死亡率较低,但发病率较高。三分之二的患者需要手术干预,三分之一的患者接受内镜治疗。胰腺导管损伤程度决定了内镜干预是否有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验