• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺创伤分级高:非手术治疗是否值得等待?

Non-operative management of high-grade pancreatic trauma: is it worth the wait?

机构信息

The Hospital for Sick Children, Division of General and Thoracic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2013 May;48(5):1060-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.027.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.027
PMID:23701783
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether children with pancreatic trauma should be managed non-operatively or operatively is controversial. We reviewed outcomes of high-grade pancreatic injuries at two high-volume pediatric surgical centres comparing non-operative and operative management strategies.

METHODS

All pancreatic traumas presenting from January 1993 to July 2010 were reviewed. Patients with high-grade pancreatic injuries were stratified based on early operative or non-operative therapy. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Regression analyses were performed to assess complication rates, length of stay, and TPN duration while controlling for injury severity score and associated injuries.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients with pancreatic injuries, 39 were grade 3 or higher. The mean ISS was 19.2 ± 10.8. Nineteen patients (50%) had associated injuries. Fifteen patients (38%) were managed operatively. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups other than ISS (p=0.03). Duration of hospitalization (p=0.01), days of TPN (p=0.003), and overall complications (p=0.007) were higher in non-operative patients. Controlling for both ISS and any associated injury, non-operative management was associated with more complications (OR 8.11; 95% CI 1.60-41.23) and was a significant predictor of prolonged TPN (13 days longer; p=0.024).

CONCLUSION

Primary non-operative management of high-grade pancreatic injuries is associated with a significant increase in complications and TPN dependency. Early operative intervention should be pursued whenever feasible.

摘要

背景

儿童胰腺创伤应采用非手术治疗还是手术治疗存在争议。我们回顾了两个大容量儿科外科中心的高等级胰腺损伤的结果,比较了非手术和手术治疗策略。

方法

回顾了 1993 年 1 月至 2010 年 7 月期间所有的胰腺创伤。根据早期手术或非手术治疗,将高等级胰腺损伤患者分层。比较了基线特征和结果。进行回归分析以评估并发症发生率、住院时间和 TPN 持续时间,同时控制损伤严重程度评分和相关损伤。

结果

77 例胰腺损伤患者中,39 例为 3 级或以上。ISS 平均值为 19.2 ± 10.8。19 例(50%)患者有相关损伤。15 例(38%)患者接受手术治疗。除 ISS 外(p=0.03),两组的基线特征相似。非手术患者的住院时间(p=0.01)、TPN 天数(p=0.003)和总并发症发生率(p=0.007)更高。在控制 ISS 和任何相关损伤后,非手术治疗与更多并发症相关(OR 8.11;95% CI 1.60-41.23),并且是 TPN 依赖性延长的显著预测因素(延长 13 天;p=0.024)。

结论

高等级胰腺损伤的初次非手术治疗与并发症和 TPN 依赖性显著增加相关。只要可行,应尽早进行手术干预。

相似文献

1
Non-operative management of high-grade pancreatic trauma: is it worth the wait?胰腺创伤分级高:非手术治疗是否值得等待?
J Pediatr Surg. 2013 May;48(5):1060-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.02.027.
2
Morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a critical appraisal of 107 consecutive patients undergoing resection at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.创伤性胰体尾切除术后的发病率和死亡率:对一家一级创伤中心连续107例行切除术患者的批判性评估。
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.024. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
3
Non-operative management of isolated solid organ injuries due to blunt abdominal trauma in children: a fifteen-year experience.儿童钝性腹部创伤所致孤立性实体器官损伤的非手术治疗:十五年经验
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Feb;14(1):29-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-815777.
4
Management of pancreatic trauma and its consequences--guidelines or individual therapy?胰腺创伤的管理及其后果——指南还是个体化治疗?
Hepatogastroenterology. 2007 Mar;54(74):581-4.
5
Pediatric pancreatic trauma: predictors of nonoperative management failure and associated outcomes.小儿胰腺创伤:非手术治疗失败的预测因素及相关结局
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Feb;42(2):340-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.10.006.
6
Local complications following pancreatic trauma.胰腺创伤后的局部并发症。
Injury. 2009 May;40(5):516-20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.026. Epub 2008 Dec 25.
7
Operative vs nonoperative management of blunt pancreatic trauma in children.儿童钝性胰腺外伤的手术与非手术治疗。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Feb;45(2):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.095.
8
Isolated pancreatic injuries: An analysis of 49 consecutive patients treated at a Level 1 Trauma Centre.孤立性胰腺损伤:对一家一级创伤中心连续治疗的49例患者的分析。
J Visc Surg. 2015 Dec;152(6):349-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
9
Management of pancreatic trauma.胰腺创伤的管理
Can J Surg. 1985 Jul;28(4):359-61.
10
Pancreatic injuries resulting from penetrating trauma: a multi-institution review.穿透性创伤所致胰腺损伤:一项多机构综述
Am Surg. 1998 Sep;64(9):838-43; discussion 843-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreaticoduodenectomy for trauma in an adolescent female with complex pancreatic and duodenal injuries: Case report and review of the literature.青少年女性复杂胰腺和十二指肠损伤行胰十二指肠切除术:病例报告及文献复习
Trauma Case Rep. 2024 May 9;51:101034. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101034. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
[Blunt abdominal trauma in children and adolescents: treatment concepts in the acute phase].[儿童和青少年钝性腹部创伤:急性期的治疗理念]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Jul;94(7):651-663. doi: 10.1007/s00104-022-01798-2. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
Delayed distal pancreatectomy for isolated complete pancreatic disruption secondary to "trivial" blunt abdominal injury: A case report and literature review.
因“轻微”钝性腹部损伤继发孤立性完全性胰腺断裂行延迟性胰体尾切除术:病例报告及文献复习
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Sep 6;10(9):e6295. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6295. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Minimally Invasive Approaches for Traumatic Rupture of the Pancreas in Children-A Case Series.儿童创伤性胰腺破裂的微创治疗方法——病例系列
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 22;9(8):1102. doi: 10.3390/children9081102.
5
Missed pancreatic injury in patients undergoing conservative management of blunt abdominal trauma: Causes, sequelae and management.钝性腹部创伤保守治疗患者中漏诊的胰腺损伤:原因、后遗症及处理
Turk J Surg. 2021 Sep 28;37(3):286-293. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2021.5425. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Pancreatico Duodenal Trauma in Children: Two-Year Experience at a Regional Referral Center and Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital.儿童胰十二指肠创伤:地区转诊中心和三级护理教学医院的两年经验
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2020 May-Jun;25(3):151-154. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_64_19. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Duodeno-pancreatic and extrahepatic biliary tree trauma: WSES-AAST guidelines.十二指肠-胰腺和肝外胆道树创伤:WSES-AAST 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Dec 11;14:56. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0278-6. eCollection 2019.
8
Review of pediatric abdominal trauma: operative and non-operative treatment in combined adult and pediatric trauma center.小儿腹部创伤综述:成人与小儿联合创伤中心的手术及非手术治疗
Acute Med Surg. 2019 Apr 7;6(4):358-364. doi: 10.1002/ams2.421. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Indications and outcomes of duodenum-preserving resection of the pancreatic head in children.儿童保留十二指肠的胰头切除术的适应证及预后
Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Apr;35(4):449-455. doi: 10.1007/s00383-018-4410-6. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
Blunt Trauma Pancreas in Children: Is Non-Operative Management Appropriate for All Grades?儿童钝性胰腺损伤:非手术治疗适用于所有分级吗?
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Dec;20(4):252-258. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.4.252. Epub 2017 Dec 22.