Suppr超能文献

执行本体。

Performing ontology.

作者信息

Aspers Patrik

出版信息

Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Jun;45(3):449-53. doi: 10.1177/0306312714548610.

Abstract

Ontology, and in particular, the so-called ontological turn, is the topic of a recent themed issue of Social Studies of Science (Volume 43, Issue 3, 2013). Ontology, or metaphysics, is in philosophy concerned with what there is, how it is, and forms of being. But to what is the science and technology studies researcher turning when he or she talks of ontology? It is argued that it is unclear what is gained by arguing that ontology also refers to constructed elements. The 'ontological turn' comes with the risk of creating a pseudo-debate or pseudo-activity, in which energy is used for no end, at the expense of empirical studies. This text rebuts the idea of an ontological turn as foreshadowed in the texts of the themed issue. It argues that there is no fundamental qualitative difference between the ontological turn and what we know as constructivism.

摘要

本体论,尤其是所谓的本体论转向,是《科学的社会研究》(2013年第43卷第3期)最近一期主题特刊的主题。本体论,或形而上学,在哲学中关注的是存在着什么、它是如何存在的以及存在的形式。但是,当科学技术研究人员谈论本体论时,他们转向了什么呢?有人认为,声称本体论也指建构元素,这样做能有什么收获并不明确。“本体论转向”伴随着制造伪辩论或伪活动的风险,在这种情况下,精力被无端消耗,却以实证研究为代价。本文反驳了主题特刊文本中所预示的本体论转向的观点。它认为,本体论转向与我们所知的建构主义之间没有根本的质的区别。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验