Chua Kao-Ping, Neuman Mark I, McWilliams J Michael, Aronson Paul L
Division of Emergency Medicine at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Pediatr. 2015 Dec;167(6):1340-6.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.021. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
To describe the association between clinical outcomes and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommending universal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing in the emergency department for febrile infants aged 29-56 days.
Using 2007-2013 administrative data from 32 US children's hospitals, we performed a difference-in-differences analysis comparing 7 hospitals with CPGs recommending universal CSF testing for older febrile infants aged 29-56 days (CPG group) with 25 hospitals without such CPGs (control group). We compared differences in clinical outcomes between older febrile infants with the corresponding differences among younger febrile infants aged 7-28 days. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an adverse event, defined as a delayed diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, mechanical ventilation, placement of a central venous catheter, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or in-hospital mortality. Analyses were adjusted for race/ethnicity, sex, median annual household income by zip code, primary insurance source, discharge season, and discharge year.
The proportion of older febrile infants undergoing CSF testing was higher (P < .001) in the CPG group (64.8%) than the control group (47.8%). CPGs recommending universal CSF testing for older febrile infants were not associated with significant differences in adverse events (difference-in-differences: +0.31 percentage points, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.85; P = .22).
Hospital CPGs recommending universal CSF testing for febrile infants aged 29-56 days were not associated with significant differences in clinical outcomes.
描述临床结局与临床实践指南(CPG)之间的关联,该指南建议对29至56日龄的发热婴儿在急诊科进行常规脑脊液(CSF)检测。
利用来自美国32家儿童医院的2007 - 2013年管理数据,我们进行了一项双重差分分析,将7家有CPG建议对29至56日龄较大发热婴儿进行常规脑脊液检测的医院(CPG组)与25家没有此类CPG的医院(对照组)进行比较。我们比较了较大发热婴儿临床结局的差异与7至28日龄较小发热婴儿相应差异。主要结局是不良事件的发生,定义为细菌性脑膜炎的延迟诊断、机械通气、中心静脉导管置入、体外膜肺氧合或院内死亡。分析针对种族/族裔、性别、按邮政编码划分的家庭年收入中位数、主要保险来源、出院季节和出院年份进行了调整。
CPG组(64.8%)中接受脑脊液检测的较大发热婴儿比例高于对照组(47.8%)(P <.001)。建议对较大发热婴儿进行常规脑脊液检测的CPG与不良事件的显著差异无关(双重差分:+0.31个百分点,95%置信区间 -0.18至0.85;P =.22)。
建议对29至56日龄发热婴儿进行常规脑脊液检测的医院CPG与临床结局的显著差异无关。