Brooks I, De Jager R, Blumenreich M, George E, Savarese J J
Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark 07103.
J Fam Pract. 1989 Mar;28(3):275-80.
Oral morphine is increasingly recognized as the pharmacologic standard for cancer pain management. Yet for the primary care physician and oncologist alike, misconceptions of the safety and efficacy of oral morphine along with lack of recognized guidelines for use have often resulted in inadequate cancer pain therapy. Use of controlled-release oral morphine sulfate (MSC) requires additional guidelines for optimum analgesia. Proposed are ten principles of dosing oral morphine, especially MSC, which were followed in a clinical trial involving cancer patients. MSC dosed at 8-, 10-, and 12-hour intervals was compared with immediate-release morphine (IRMS) dosed every four hours, and with prestudy analgesics. Patients achieved satisfactory analgesia at daily doses (mean +/- SE) of 118.0 +/- 8.6 mg and 111.4 +/- 12.6 mg (P greater than .05) for IRMS and MSC, respectively. Dosing endpoints were determined by titration with IRMS and MSC to a minimal and equivalent amount of supplemental short-acting analgesic. Side effects were typical for opioids and tolerated except for one dropout on IRMS (nausea and constipation). The ten principles have been incorporated into a dosing scheme as a practical guide for MSC therapy.
口服吗啡日益被视为癌症疼痛管理的药理学标准。然而,对于初级保健医生和肿瘤学家而言,对口服吗啡安全性和有效性的误解以及缺乏公认的使用指南,常常导致癌症疼痛治疗不足。使用控释硫酸吗啡(MSC)需要额外的指南以实现最佳镇痛效果。本文提出了口服吗啡(尤其是MSC)的十条给药原则,这些原则在一项涉及癌症患者的临床试验中得到遵循。将每8、10和12小时给药一次的MSC与每4小时给药一次的即释吗啡(IRMS)以及研究前使用的镇痛药进行比较。IRMS和MSC的每日剂量(均值±标准误)分别为118.0±8.6毫克和111.4±12.6毫克时,患者达到了满意的镇痛效果(P>0.05)。给药终点通过用IRMS和MSC滴定至最小且等效量的补充短效镇痛药来确定。副作用是阿片类药物的典型症状,除了一名因IRMS出现恶心和便秘而退出试验的患者外,其余患者均可耐受。这十条原则已被纳入一个给药方案,作为MSC治疗的实用指南。