Cundiff D, McCarthy K, Savarese J J, Kaiko R, Thomas G, Grandy R, Goldenheim P
Cancer Pain Consultation Service LAC-USC.
Cancer. 1989 Jun 1;63(11 Suppl):2355-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890601)63:11<2355::aid-cncr2820631147>3.0.co;2-#.
A double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study compared oral controlled-release morphine sulfate (MS Contin tablets [MSC], Purdue Frederick, Norwalk, CT) every 12 hours, and immediate-release morphine sulfate (IRMS) tablets, every 4 hours, in 14 evaluable patients with chronic cancer pain. The test model described showed assay sensitivity for steady-state analgesia, requiring relatively few subjects to yield statistical significance in pharmacologic potency estimates. Initial doses were the calculated equivalents of about one third the previous opioid requirements or at least 30 mg MSC every 12 hours or 15 mg IRMS every 4 hours. This was generally subtherapeutic; hence, additional IRMS was available for break-through pain. Doses of MSC and IRMS were titrated upwards until the requirement for rescue IRMS was less than 20% of the total daily amount of morphine. In both study phases, the total dose of morphine increased significantly from the first day to the last, on which it was significantly (34%) higher for IRMS than MSC. Pain was significantly less intense and frequent in the last 24 hours of each treatment arm than in the first, and equally well controlled by both regimens. The two treatments were equipotent in a pharmacologic assay using dosages and pain scores. The requirement for rescue analgesia was similarly comparable for both treatments, decreasing significantly with upward dose titration. The few side effects experienced (one with MSC and three with IRMS) did not include serious reactions such as respiratory depression. It is concluded that MSC, 12-hourly, controls cancer pain as effectively and safely as IRMS on a 4-hour schedule. MS Contin exhibits a 12-hour duration of action as previously shown in other well-controlled trials. A problem of pain exacerbation at the start of each study phase was found to be associated with the design of this study. It may be resolved with a higher initial study dose and/or use of a patient-controlled analgesia device for parenteral rescue doses.
一项双盲、双模拟、交叉研究比较了每12小时口服控释硫酸吗啡(美施康定片[MSC],普渡弗雷德里克公司,诺沃克,康涅狄格州)和每4小时口服即释硫酸吗啡(IRMS)片,研究对象为14例可评估的慢性癌痛患者。所描述的测试模型显示了对稳态镇痛的测定敏感性,在药理效力评估中只需相对较少的受试者就能产生统计学意义。初始剂量为先前阿片类药物需求量的约三分之一的计算等效量,或每12小时至少30毫克MSC或每4小时15毫克IRMS。这通常低于治疗剂量;因此,额外的IRMS可用于治疗爆发性疼痛。MSC和IRMS的剂量向上滴定,直到抢救用IRMS的需求量低于吗啡每日总量的20%。在两个研究阶段,吗啡的总剂量从第一天到最后一天均显著增加,最后一天IRMS的总剂量比MSC显著高34%。每个治疗组的最后24小时疼痛强度和频率均显著低于第一天,两种治疗方案对疼痛的控制效果相同。在使用剂量和疼痛评分的药理试验中,两种治疗等效。两种治疗的抢救镇痛需求量相似,随着剂量向上滴定而显著降低。所经历的少数副作用(1例使用MSC,3例使用IRMS)不包括呼吸抑制等严重反应。结论是,每12小时服用一次MSC控制癌痛的效果与每4小时服用一次IRMS一样有效和安全。如先前在其他严格控制的试验中所示,美施康定的作用持续时间为12小时。发现每个研究阶段开始时疼痛加剧的问题与本研究的设计有关。这一问题可以通过更高的初始研究剂量和/或使用患者自控镇痛装置给予胃肠外抢救剂量来解决。