Greene Ashley L, Eaton Nicholas R
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.09.060. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
Scientific debate has long surrounded whether agoraphobia is a severe consequence of panic disorder or a frequently comorbid diagnosis. Multivariate comorbidity investigations typically treat these diagnoses as fungible in structural models, assuming both are manifestations of the fear-subfactor in the internalizing-externalizing model. No studies have directly compared these disorders' multivariate associations, which could clarify their conceptualization in classification and comorbidity research.
In a nationally representative sample (N=43,093), we examined the multivariate comorbidity of panic disorder (1) without agoraphobia, (2) with agoraphobia, and (3) regardless of agoraphobia; and (4) agoraphobia without panic. We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of these and 10 other lifetime DSM-IV diagnoses in a nationally representative sample (N=43,093).
Differing bivariate and multivariate relations were found. Panic disorder without agoraphobia was largely a distress disorder, related to emotional disorders. Agoraphobia without panic was largely a fear disorder, related to phobias. When considered jointly, concomitant agoraphobia and panic was a fear disorder, and when panic was assessed without regard to agoraphobia (some individuals had agoraphobia while others did not) it was a mixed distress and fear disorder.
Diagnoses were obtained from comprehensively trained lay interviewers, not clinicians and analyses used DSM-IV diagnoses (rather than DSM-5).
These findings support the conceptualization of agoraphobia as a distinct diagnostic entity and the independent classification of both disorders in DSM-5, suggesting future multivariate comorbidity studies should not assume various panic/agoraphobia diagnoses are invariably fear disorders.
关于广场恐惧症是惊恐障碍的严重后果还是一种常见的共病诊断,长期以来一直存在科学争论。多变量共病研究通常在结构模型中将这些诊断视为可互换的,假设两者都是内化-外化模型中恐惧子因素的表现。尚无研究直接比较这些障碍的多变量关联,而这种比较可能会在分类和共病研究中澄清它们的概念。
在一个具有全国代表性的样本(N = 43,093)中,我们研究了(1)无广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍、(2)有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍、(3)不论有无广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍以及(4)无惊恐的广场恐惧症的多变量共病情况。我们对这些以及其他10种终生的DSM-IV诊断在一个具有全国代表性的样本(N = 43,093)中进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。
发现了不同的双变量和多变量关系。无广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍在很大程度上是一种痛苦障碍,与情绪障碍有关。无惊恐的广场恐惧症在很大程度上是一种恐惧障碍,与恐惧症有关。当共同考虑时,伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍是一种恐惧障碍,而当不考虑广场恐惧症来评估惊恐障碍时(一些个体有广场恐惧症而另一些没有),它是一种痛苦与恐惧混合的障碍。
诊断是由经过全面培训的非专业访谈者获得的,而非临床医生,并且分析使用的是DSM-IV诊断(而非DSM-5)。
这些发现支持将广场恐惧症概念化为一个独特的诊断实体,以及在DSM-5中对这两种障碍进行独立分类,这表明未来的多变量共病研究不应假定各种惊恐/广场恐惧症诊断总是恐惧障碍。