Suppr超能文献

公众对动物研究的态度:综述

Public Attitudes toward Animal Research: A Review.

作者信息

Ormandy Elisabeth H, Schuppli Catherine A

机构信息

Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2014 Jun 30;4(3):391-408. doi: 10.3390/ani4030391.

Abstract

The exploration of public attitudes toward animal research is important given recent developments in animal research (e.g., increasing creation and use of genetically modified animals, and plans for progress in areas such as personalized medicine), and the shifting relationship between science and society (i.e., a move toward the democratization of science). As such, public engagement on issues related to animal research, including exploration of public attitudes, provides a means of achieving socially acceptable scientific practice and oversight through an understanding of societal values and concerns. Numerous studies have been conducted to explore public attitudes toward animal use, and more specifically the use of animals in research. This paper reviews relevant literature using three categories of influential factors: personal and cultural characteristics, animal characteristics, and research characteristics. A critique is given of survey style methods used to collect data on public attitudes, and recommendations are given on how best to address current gaps in public attitudes literature.

摘要

鉴于动物研究领域的最新进展(例如,转基因动物的创造和使用不断增加,以及个性化医疗等领域的发展计划)以及科学与社会关系的转变(即向科学民主化的转变),探索公众对动物研究的态度非常重要。因此,就与动物研究相关的问题进行公众参与,包括探索公众态度,通过了解社会价值观和关注点,提供了一种实现社会可接受的科学实践和监督的途径。已经进行了大量研究来探索公众对动物使用的态度,更具体地说是对动物在研究中的使用的态度。本文使用三类影响因素来回顾相关文献:个人和文化特征、动物特征以及研究特征。对用于收集公众态度数据的调查方式方法进行了批判,并就如何最好地弥补当前公众态度文献中的差距提出了建议。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Incorporating farm animal models for the study of neuropsychiatric diseases: Expansion of the possibilities.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.3758/s13415-025-01332-x.
2
The impact of dog phobia severity on views regarding stray dog management in Türkiye.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 May 7;12:1548580. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1548580. eCollection 2025.
3
Cards, cubes, and collaboration: a case study of the development of an educational board game.
Discov Educ. 2025;4(1):79. doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00472-z. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
4
Data Hazards as An Ethical Toolkit for Neuroscience.
Neuroethics. 2025;18(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s12152-024-09580-3. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
5
Social Perception of Zoos and Aquariums: What We Know and How We Know It.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Dec 19;14(24):3671. doi: 10.3390/ani14243671.
6
Survey Results on the Awareness of Laboratory Animal Welfare among Medical Graduate Students.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2024 Nov 1;63(6):636-643. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-000013.
9
Exploring University Students' Perspectives on Animal Experimentation: Insights From a Cross-Sectional Study.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63904. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63904. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Public perceptions of animal experimentation across Europe.
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Aug;22(6):691-703. doi: 10.1177/0963662511428045. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
2
Understanding attitudes towards the use of animals in research using an online public engagement tool.
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Apr;24(3):358-74. doi: 10.1177/0963662513490466. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
3
Factors affecting people's acceptance of the use of zebrafish and mice in research.
Altern Lab Anim. 2012 Dec;40(6):321-33. doi: 10.1177/026119291204000605.
4
Secrets and lies: "selective openness" in the apparatus of animal experimentation.
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Apr;21(3):354-68. doi: 10.1177/0963662510372584.
5
Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research.
Public Underst Sci. 2010 Nov;19(6):686-97. doi: 10.1177/0963662510362834.
6
The role of 'public opinion' in the UK animal research debate.
J Med Ethics. 2010 Jan;36(1):46-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.030817.
7
Highly Efficient ENU Mutagenesis in Zebrafish.
Methods Mol Biol. 2009;546:3-12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-977-2_1.
9
Free the animals? Investigating attitudes toward animal testing in Britain and the United States.
Scand J Psychol. 2008 Jun;49(3):269-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00636.x.
10
The meaning of "natural": process more important than content.
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):652-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01589.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验