• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学家对公民理解科学的程度及其在公众参与活动中的作用的看法和态度。

Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.

机构信息

Studies Centre on Science, Communication and Society, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

Group of Educational Research in Health Sciences, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0224262
PMID:31721768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6853295/
Abstract

The increasing perception that public communication in science and technology is an important tool to create a knowledge society is encouraging numerous public engagement activities. However, too little is known about scientists' opinions of and attitudes towards the public with whom they interact during these activities, especially in southern European countries such as Spain. If we want to establish an effective dialogue between science and society, we need to be aware of the opinions and perceptions that both parties have of each other. In this study, we address this issue by focusing on 1022 responses to a survey conducted among scientists in Spain to discover their views of the public, and we then compare these responses with data from other national surveys on the public's understanding of science. The results show that approximately 75% of Spanish scientists think that the general public has a serious lack of knowledge and understanding of scientific reasoning, although scientists do recognize that science interests the public (73%). Scientists believe that the public values the scientific profession to a lesser extent than suggested by public surveys: on a scale of 1-5, survey respondents rate their valuation of the scientific profession at 4.22, whereas scientists rate the public's valuation of the profession at 3.12, on average. Significant differences were detected between scientists' perceptions of how citizens are informed about science and what citizens report in surveys. The challenge for the future is to narrow this gap in order to help scientists gain a better understanding of the public and their interests and to make public engagement activities more effective.

摘要

公众对科技传播作为构建知识社会的重要工具的认识不断提高,这促使了大量公众参与活动的开展。然而,人们对科学家在这些活动中与公众互动时的看法和态度知之甚少,尤其是在西班牙等南欧国家。如果我们想在科学和社会之间建立有效的对话,就需要了解双方对彼此的看法和看法。在这项研究中,我们通过关注西班牙科学家的 1022 份调查回复,来解决这个问题,以发现他们对公众的看法,然后将这些回复与其他关于公众对科学理解的国家调查数据进行比较。结果表明,大约 75%的西班牙科学家认为,公众对科学推理严重缺乏了解和认识,尽管科学家们确实认识到科学是公众感兴趣的(73%)。科学家们认为,公众对科学职业的重视程度低于公众调查所显示的程度:在 1-5 的范围内,调查受访者对科学职业的评价为 4.22,而科学家对公众对该职业的评价平均为 3.12。科学家们对公民了解科学的方式的看法与公民在调查中的报告之间存在显著差异。未来的挑战是缩小这一差距,以帮助科学家更好地了解公众及其利益,并使公众参与活动更加有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/c511b7d38067/pone.0224262.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/673cb852641a/pone.0224262.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/f1ed6c8e0b11/pone.0224262.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/81d85311c5ca/pone.0224262.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/d710e9fbc123/pone.0224262.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/7c4e5fa22217/pone.0224262.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/a1c7369cdafc/pone.0224262.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/6a3feab23c1b/pone.0224262.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/c511b7d38067/pone.0224262.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/673cb852641a/pone.0224262.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/f1ed6c8e0b11/pone.0224262.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/81d85311c5ca/pone.0224262.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/d710e9fbc123/pone.0224262.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/7c4e5fa22217/pone.0224262.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/a1c7369cdafc/pone.0224262.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/6a3feab23c1b/pone.0224262.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6008/6853295/c511b7d38067/pone.0224262.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.科学家对公民理解科学的程度及其在公众参与活动中的作用的看法和态度。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.
2
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
3
Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?为什么拉丁美洲科学家对公民科学作为传粉媒介监测和保护工具的看法很重要?
Neotrop Entomol. 2020 Aug;49(4):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00793-8. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
4
A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.科学家与传播学学者对于科学家公众参与活动的观点比较。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-118. doi: 10.1177/0963662518797002. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
5
Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.科学家对公众的认知不足阻碍了他们纠正错误信息的行为意愿。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.
6
Public opinions about human enhancement can enhance the expert-only debate: A review study.公众对人类增强的看法能够推动仅由专家参与的辩论:一项综述研究。
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jul;25(5):588-602. doi: 10.1177/0963662514566748. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?理性的诱惑:为何缺陷模型在科学传播中持续存在?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14. doi: 10.1177/0963662516629749.
8
Attitudes to biotechnology: estimating the opinions of a better-informed public.对生物技术的态度:评估信息更灵通的公众的意见。
New Genet Soc. 2005 Apr;24(1):31-56. doi: 10.1080/14636770500037693.
9
Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.安然无恙?科学家对公众参与新兴生物技术的理解。
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145033. eCollection 2015.
10
Attitudes and perceptions of Conacyt researchers towards public communication of science and technology.国家科学技术委员会(Conacyt)研究人员对科技公共传播的态度和看法。
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):85-100. doi: 10.1177/0963662518781466. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Examination of public perceptions of microbes and microbiomes in the United States reveals insights for science communication.美国公众对微生物和微生物组的看法研究揭示了科学传播的新见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 21;19(10):e0312427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312427. eCollection 2024.
2
From science to society: Exploring the nexus between obesity research and public awareness in Brazil.从科学到社会:探索巴西肥胖研究与公众意识之间的联系。
Heliyon. 2024 Sep 18;10(19):e37968. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37968. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
3
Combining postgraduate research training, public engagement, and primary school science education-a Superbugs Master (MSc) class.

本文引用的文献

1
Our science, our society.我们的科学,我们的社会。
Science. 2018 Feb 2;359(6375):499. doi: 10.1126/science.aat0957. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?科学家们如何在工作场所使用社交媒体?
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0162680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162680. eCollection 2016.
3
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.科学家对公众参与沟通目标的优先排序。
结合研究生研究培训、公众参与和小学科学教育——超级细菌硕士(理学硕士)课程。
Front Microbiol. 2024 May 31;15:1380045. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1380045. eCollection 2024.
4
University student-led public engagement event: increasing audience diversity and impact in a non-science space.大学生主导的公众参与活动:在非科学领域增加受众多样性并扩大影响力。
Access Microbiol. 2023 Aug 29;5(8). doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000534.v3. eCollection 2023.
5
Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare: The Past, Present and Future.家庭医学与初级医疗保健:过去、现在与未来
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;11(15):2128. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152128.
6
"The chilling effect": Medical scientists' responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic.“寒蝉效应”:医学科学家对 COVID-19 大流行期间其媒体露面的观众反馈的回应。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):546-560. doi: 10.1177/09636625221146749. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
User involvement in ageing and health research: a survey of researchers' and older adults' perspectives.用户参与老龄化和健康研究:研究人员和老年人观点的调查。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 1;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00894-3.
8
COVID-19 and Digital Health: Evolution, Perspectives and Opportunities.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与数字健康:演变、展望与机遇。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8519. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148519.
9
Mapping mental models of science communication: How academics in Germany, Austria and Switzerland understand and practice science communication.描绘科学传播的心智模型:德国、奥地利和瑞士的学者如何理解和实践科学传播。
Public Underst Sci. 2022 Aug;31(6):711-731. doi: 10.1177/09636625211065743. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
10
Playing God and tampering with nature: popular labels for real concerns in synthetic biology.扮演上帝并篡改自然:合成生物学中真实担忧的流行标签。
Transgenic Res. 2021 Apr;30(2):155-167. doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00233-2. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
4
Mapping public engagement with research in a UK University.描绘英国一所大学中公众对研究的参与情况。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2;10(4):e0121874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121874. eCollection 2015.
5
Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training.向公众进行科学传播:为何我们需要将此技能作为本科生和研究生正规科学训练的一部分来教授。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2013 Oct 15;12(1):E6-E10. eCollection 2013.
6
How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.科学家如何看待公众、媒体和政治进程。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Aug;22(6):644-59. doi: 10.1177/0963662511418743. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
7
Predicting scientists' participation in public life.预测科学家参与公共生活。
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):971-87. doi: 10.1177/0963662512459315. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
8
Word diffusion and climate science.词汇扩散与气候科学。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e47966. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047966. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
9
How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach.学术生物学家和物理学家如何看待科学传播。
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036240. Epub 2012 May 9.
10
Social identities and risk: expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use.社会身份与风险:专家和外行对农药使用的想象
Public Underst Sci. 2008 Apr;17(2):189-209. doi: 10.1177/0963662506070176.