Tsay Chia-Jung
University College London, UK
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Jan;42(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/0146167215611638. Epub 2015 Oct 19.
A preference for "naturals" over "strivers" in performance judgments was investigated to test whether the effect is generalizable across domains, as well as to ascertain any costs imposed on decision quality by favoring naturals. Despite being presented with entrepreneurs equal in achievement, participants judged the natural and his business proposal to be superior to the striver and his proposal on multiple dimensions of performance and success (Study 1a and Study 1b). These findings were extended in Study 2, which quantified the costs of the naturalness bias using conjoint analysis to measure specific decision tradeoffs. Together, these three studies show that people tend to pass over better-qualified individuals in favor of apparent naturals.
在绩效判断中,人们对“天赋型”优于“奋斗型”的偏好进行了研究,以测试这种效应是否能跨领域推广,同时确定偏向天赋型对决策质量造成的成本。尽管向参与者展示了成就相当的企业家,但他们在多个绩效和成功维度上,认为天赋型企业家及其商业提案优于奋斗型企业家及其提案(研究1a和研究1b)。研究2扩展了这些发现,该研究使用联合分析来衡量具体的决策权衡,从而量化了天赋偏好的成本。这三项研究共同表明,人们往往会忽略资质更优的个体,而青睐看似有天赋的人。