Suppr超能文献

伦敦癌症患者经历洞察:对来自两个伦敦综合癌症系统的2012/2013年国家癌症患者体验调查中的自由文本数据进行框架分析

Insights into the experiences of patients with cancer in London: framework analysis of free-text data from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2012/2013 from the two London Integrated Cancer Systems.

作者信息

Wiseman Theresa, Lucas Grace, Sangha Amrit, Randolph Anuska, Stapleton Sarah, Pattison Natalie, O'Gara Geraldine, Harris Katherine, Pritchard-Jones Kathy, Dolan Shelley

机构信息

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 19;5(10):e007792. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007792.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To shed light on experiences of patients with cancer in London National Health Service (NHS) trusts that may not be fully captured in national survey data, to inform improvement action plans by these trusts.

DESIGN

Framework analysis of free-text data from 2012/2013 National Cancer Patient Experience Survey (NCPES) from the 2 London Integrated Cancer Systems.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with a cancer diagnosis treated by the NHS across 27 trusts in London.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Free-text data received from patients categorised into what patients found good about their cancer care and what could be improved.

METHODS

Using Framework analysis, a thematic framework was created for 15,403 comments from over 6500 patients. Themes were identified across the London data set, by tumour group and by trust.

RESULTS

Two-thirds of free-text comments from patients in London were positive and one-third of those related to the good quality of care those patients received. However, the majority of comments for improvement related to quality of care, with a focus on poor care, poor communication and waiting times in outpatient departments. Additionally, 577 patients (9% of those who returned free-text data in London) commented on issues pertaining to the questionnaire itself. Some patients who experienced care from multiple trusts were unclear on how to complete the questionnaire for the single trust whose care they were asked to comment on, others said the questions did not fit their experiences.

CONCLUSIONS

NCPES free-text analysis can shed light on the experiences of patients that closed questions might not reveal. It further indicates that there are issues with the survey itself, in terms of ambiguities in the questionnaire and difficulties in identifying patients within specific trusts. Both of these issues have the potential to contribute to knowledge and understanding of the uses and limitations of free-text data in improving cancer services.

摘要

目的

深入了解伦敦国民保健服务体系(NHS)信托机构中癌症患者的经历,而这些经历可能在全国调查数据中未得到充分体现,从而为这些信托机构的改进行动计划提供参考。

设计

对来自伦敦两个综合癌症系统的2012/2013年全国癌症患者体验调查(NCPES)中的自由文本数据进行框架分析。

设置与参与者

伦敦27个信托机构中接受NHS治疗的癌症确诊患者。

主要观察指标

从患者那里收到的自由文本数据,分为患者认为其癌症护理中的优点以及可改进之处。

方法

使用框架分析,为来自6500多名患者的15403条评论创建了一个主题框架。通过伦敦数据集、肿瘤组和信托机构来确定主题。

结果

伦敦患者的自由文本评论中有三分之二是积极的,其中三分之一与患者所接受护理的高质量有关。然而,大多数改进意见都与护理质量有关,重点是护理不佳、沟通不畅和门诊等待时间。此外,577名患者(占伦敦返回自由文本数据患者的9%)对问卷本身的问题发表了评论。一些在多个信托机构接受护理的患者不清楚如何填写要求他们对其护理进行评论的单一信托机构的问卷,其他人则表示问题与他们的经历不符。

结论

NCPES自由文本分析可以揭示封闭式问题可能无法揭示的患者经历。它还进一步表明,调查本身存在问题,包括问卷中的模糊性以及在特定信托机构内识别患者的困难。这两个问题都有可能促进对自由文本数据在改善癌症服务中的用途和局限性的认识与理解。

相似文献

5
Computer-assisted textual analysis of free-text comments in the Swiss Cancer Patient Experiences (SCAPE) survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):1029. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05873-4.
7
9
10
Development and testing of a text-mining approach to analyse patients' comments on their experiences of colorectal cancer care.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):604-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004063. Epub 2015 Oct 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematizing Complaints About Healthcare and Services at University Hospitals: Content Analysis of Patient/Family Letters.
J Patient Exp. 2024 Jun 14;11:23743735241261232. doi: 10.1177/23743735241261232. eCollection 2024.
2
Symptom-based staging for logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia.
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Jul;31(7):e16304. doi: 10.1111/ene.16304. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
5
Symptom-led staging for semantic and non-fluent/agrammatic variants of primary progressive aphasia.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jan;20(1):195-210. doi: 10.1002/alz.13415. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
Parents Have More to Say: Comments From the Child HCAHPS Single Question Versus a Narrative Item Set.
Hosp Pediatr. 2023 Apr 1;13(4):345-356. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-007046.
8
Driving resumption after critical illness:A survey and framework analysis of patient experience and process.
J Intensive Care Soc. 2023 Feb;24(1):9-15. doi: 10.1177/17511437221099118. Epub 2022 May 3.
9
What Parents have to Say: Content and Actionability of Narrative Comments from Child HCAHPS Survey.
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Feb 1;12(2):205-219. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006032.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer care in northern England rated best in England.
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Oct;14(11):e445. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70423-6. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
3
Trends in the lifetime risk of developing cancer in Great Britain: comparison of risk for those born from 1930 to 1960.
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 3;112(5):943-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.606. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
7
Cancer patient experience, hospital performance and case mix: evidence from England.
Future Oncol. 2014;10(9):1589-98. doi: 10.2217/fon.13.266. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Qualitative analysis of patients' feedback from a PROMs survey of cancer patients in England.
BMJ Open. 2013 Apr 10;3(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002316. Print 2013.
10
Implementing patient-centred cancer care: using experience-based co-design to improve patient experience in breast and lung cancer services.
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Nov;20(11):2639-47. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1470-3. Epub 2012 Apr 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验