RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407, United States of America.
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1736, United States of America; UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 May-Jun;76:e126-e131. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.02.016. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
Adults' comments on patient experience surveys explain variation in provider ratings, with negative comments providing more actionable information than positive comments. We investigate if narrative comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) survey of inpatient pediatric care (Child HCAHPS) account for global perceptions of the hospital beyond that explained by reports about specific aspects of care.
We analyzed 545 comments from 927 Child HCAHPS surveys completed by parents and guardians of hospitalized children with at least a 24-h hospital stay from July 2017 to December 2020 at an urban children's hospital. Comments were coded for valence (positive/negative/mixed) and actionability and used to predict Overall Hospital Rating and Willingness to Recommend the Hospital along with Child HCAHPS composite scores.
Comments were provided more often by White and more educated respondents. Negative comments and greater actionability of comments were significantly associated with Child HCAHPS global rating measures, controlling for responses to closed-ended questions, and child and respondent characteristics. Each explained an additional 8% of the variance in respondents' overall hospital ratings and an additional 5% in their willingness to recommend the hospital.
Child HCAHPS narrative comment data provide significant additional information about what is important to parents and guardians during inpatient pediatric care beyond closed-ended composites.
Quality improvement efforts should include a review of narrative comments alongside closed-ended responses to help identify ways to improve inpatient care experiences. To promote health equity, comments should be encouraged for racial-and-ethnic minority patients and those with less educational attainment.
成年人对患者体验调查的评论解释了提供者评分的差异,负面评论比正面评论提供了更多可操作的信息。我们调查了住院儿科护理(儿童 HCAHPS)消费者评估医疗保健提供者和系统(CAHPS®)调查中的叙述性评论是否解释了医院的整体感知超出了对特定护理方面的报告解释的范围。
我们分析了 2017 年 7 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,在一家城市儿童医院住院至少 24 小时的儿童的父母和监护人完成的 927 份儿童 HCAHPS 调查中的 545 条评论。评论按正值(正面/负面/混合)和可操作性进行编码,并用于预测总体医院评分和推荐医院的意愿,以及儿童 HCAHPS 综合评分。
评论更多地由白人患者和受教育程度更高的患者提供。负面评论和评论的可操作性与儿童 HCAHPS 全球评分指标显著相关,控制了对封闭式问题的回答以及儿童和受访者的特征。这两个因素分别解释了受访者对医院整体评分的额外 8%的差异和对推荐医院的额外 5%的差异。
儿童 HCAHPS 叙述性评论数据提供了关于住院儿科护理期间对父母和监护人重要的重要信息,超过了封闭式综合评分。
质量改进工作应包括审查叙述性评论以及封闭式反应,以帮助确定改善住院护理体验的方法。为了促进健康公平,应鼓励少数民族和教育程度较低的患者发表评论。