Broderick Joseph P, Berkhemer Olvert A, Palesch Yuko Y, Dippel Diederik W J, Foster Lydia D, Roos Yvo B W E M, van der Lugt Aad, Tomsick Thomas A, Majoie Charles B L M, van Zwam Wim H, Demchuk Andrew M, van Oostenbrugge Robert J, Khatri Pooja, Lingsma Hester F, Hill Michael D, Roozenbeek Bob, Jauch Edward C, Jovin Tudor G, Yan Bernard, von Kummer Rüdiger, Molina Carlos A, Goyal Mayank, Schonewille Wouter J, Mazighi Mikael, Engelter Stefan T, Anderson Craig S, Spilker Judith, Carrozzella Janice, Ryckborst Karla J, Janis L Scott, Simpson Kit N
From the Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine and Radiology, University of Cincinnati Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH (J.P.B., P.K., J.S., J.C., T.A.T.); Division of Emergency Medicine (E.C.J.), Department of Public Health Sciences (Y.Y.P., L.D.F.), and Department of Healthcare Management and Leadership (K.N.S.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Calgary Stroke Program, Seaman Family MR Research Centre, Departments of Clinical Neurosciences and Radiology, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (A.M.D., M.D.H., M.G., K.J.R.); the Stroke Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA (T.G.J.); Melbourne Brain Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (B.Y.); Department of Neuroradiology, Dresden University Stroke Center, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany (R.v.K.); Neurovascular Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain (C.A.M.); Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht and the Rudolph Magnus Institute of Neurosciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands (W.J.S.); St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands (W.J.S.); Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France (M.M.); Department of Neurology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland (S.T.E.); the George Institute for Global Health, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney (C.S.A.); and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD (L.S.J.); the Department of Radiology (O.A.B., C.B.L.M.M.) and Neurology (Y.B.W.E.M.R.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Neurology (D.W.J.D., B.R.), Radiology (A.v.d.L.), and Public Health (H.F.L.), Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands; and Department of Radiology (W.H.v.Z.) and N
Stroke. 2015 Dec;46(12):3416-22. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011397. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
We assessed the effect of endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke patients with severe neurological deficit (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≥20) after a prespecified analysis plan.
The pooled analysis of the Interventional Management of Stroke III (IMS III) and Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) trials included participants with an National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥20 before intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) treatment (IMS III) or randomization (MR CLEAN) who were treated with intravenous tPA ≤3 hours of stroke onset. Our hypothesis was that participants with severe stroke randomized to endovascular therapy after intravenous tPA would have improved 90-day outcome (distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores), when compared with those who received intravenous tPA alone.
Among 342 participants in the pooled analysis (194 from IMS III and 148 from MR CLEAN), an ordinal logistic regression model showed that the endovascular group had superior 90-day outcome compared with the intravenous tPA group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.66). In the logistic regression model of the dichotomous outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2, or functional independence), the endovascular group had superior outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.56). Functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, ≤2) at 90 days was 25% in the endovascular group when compared with 14% in the intravenous tPA group.
Endovascular therapy after intravenous tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset improves functional outcome at 90 days after severe ischemic stroke.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00359424 (IMS III) and ISRCTN10888758 (MR CLEAN).
在经过预先设定的分析计划后,我们评估了血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中且伴有严重神经功能缺损(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≥20分)患者的疗效。
对卒中的介入治疗III(IMS III)试验和荷兰急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗多中心随机临床试验(MR CLEAN)进行汇总分析,纳入在静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)治疗前(IMS III)或随机分组前(MR CLEAN)美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分≥20分、且在卒中发作≤3小时接受静脉tPA治疗的参与者。我们的假设是,与单纯接受静脉tPA治疗的参与者相比,在静脉tPA治疗后被随机分配接受血管内治疗的严重卒中患者90天预后(改良Rankin量表评分分布)会得到改善。
在汇总分析的342名参与者中(194名来自IMS III,148名来自MR CLEAN),一个有序逻辑回归模型显示,血管内治疗组90天预后优于静脉tPA治疗组(调整优势比,1.78;95%置信区间,1.20 - 2.66)。在二分结局(改良Rankin量表评分,0 - 2分,即功能独立)的逻辑回归模型中,血管内治疗组预后更好(调整优势比,1.97;95%置信区间,1.09 - 3.56)。血管内治疗组90天时功能独立(改良Rankin量表评分≤2分)的比例为25%,而静脉tPA治疗组为14%。
症状发作3小时内静脉tPA治疗后再进行血管内治疗可改善严重缺血性脑卒中90天后的功能结局。
网址:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT00359424(IMS III)和ISRCTN10888758(MR CLEAN)。