Stiripentol for focal refractory epilepsy.

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in 2014 (Issue 1). For nearly 30% of people with epilepsy, seizures are not controlled by current treatments. Stiripentol is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that was developed in France and was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2007 for the treatment of Dravet syndrome as adjunctive therapy with valproate and clobazam, with promising effects.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of stiripentol as add-on treatment for patients with focal refractory epilepsy who are taking AEDs.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (10 August 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; August 2015, Issue 8)and MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to 10 August 2015). We contacted Biocodex (the manufacturer of stiripentol) and epilepsy experts to identify published, unpublished and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled add-on trials of stiripentol in patients with focal refractory epilepsy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes investigated included 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, seizure freedom, adverse effects, treatment withdrawal and changes in quality of life.

MAIN RESULTS

On the basis of our selection criteria, we included no new studies in the present review. However, we did include one study from the earlier review (32 children with focal epilepsy). This study adopted a 'responder enriched' design and found no clear evidence of a reduction in seizure frequency (≥ 50% seizure reduction) (risk ratio (RR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81 to 2.82) nor evidence of seizure freedom (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.31 to 4.43) when add-on stiripentol was compared with placebo. Stiripentol led to a greater risk of adverse effects considered as a whole (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.08 to 6.47). When specific adverse events were considered, confidence intervals were very wide and showed the possibility of substantial increases and small reductions in risks of neurological (RR 2.65, 95% CI 0.88 to 8.01) or gastrointestinal adverse effects (RR 11.56, 95% CI 0.71 to 189.36). Researchers noted no clear reduction in the risk of study withdrawal (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.47), which was high in both groups (35.0% in add-on placebo and 53.3% in stiripentol group). The external validity of this study was limited because only responders to stiripentol (i.e. patients experiencing a ≥ 50% decrease in seizure frequency compared with baseline) were included in the randomised add-on placebo-controlled double-blind phase. Furthermore, carry-over and withdrawal effects probably influenced outcomes related to seizure frequency. Very limited information derived from the only included study shows that adverse effects considered as a whole seemed to occur significantly more often with add-on stiripentol than with add-on placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Since the last version of this review was published, we have found no new studies. Hence, we have made no changes to the conclusions of this update as presented in the initial review. We can draw no conclusions to support the use of stiripentol as add-on treatment for focal refractory epilepsy. Additional large, randomised, well-conducted trials are needed.