• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量静脉注射环磷酰胺与口服吗替麦考酚酯治疗狼疮性肾炎的比较。

Comparison of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide with oral mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2016 Jan;89(1):235-42. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.318. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1038/ki.2015.318
PMID:26489028
Abstract

No previous study has compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with low-dose cyclophosphamide (CYC) in the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). To do so, we recruited patients with LN (class III, IV, or V) and randomized them to receive either low-dose CYC or oral MMF. Those with crescentic LN, a serum creatinine over 265 μmol/l, and neurological or pulmonary lupus were excluded. MMF was prescribed at daily doses of 1.5-3 g for 24 weeks, while CYC was administered as six fortnightly infusions of 500 mg each. All patients received three methylprednisolone injections, followed by oral corticosteroids. Maintenance therapy with azathioprine and low-dose corticosteroid was started at end of induction therapy. The primary end point was treatment response at 24 weeks, while secondary end points were complete remission, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index and adverse events. Of the 173 patients recruited, 100 were equally randomized to receive either CYC or MMF. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for higher 24 h proteinuria in the CYC group. At 24 weeks, 37 patients in each group achieved the primary end point. The complete remission rate was 50% in CYC and 54% in MMF group. Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly more frequent in patients receiving MMF (52 vs. 4%). However, other adverse events were similar. Thus, low-dose intravenous CYC is comparable in safety and efficacy to oral MMF in the induction treatment of less severe LN.

摘要

此前尚无研究比较霉酚酸酯(MMF)与低剂量环磷酰胺(CYC)在狼疮肾炎(LN)治疗中的效果。为了进行比较,我们招募了 LN(III、IV 或 V 类)患者,并将他们随机分为接受低剂量 CYC 或口服 MMF 治疗的两组。排除新月体性 LN、血清肌酐>265μmol/l、神经或肺部狼疮患者。MMF 治疗剂量为每日 1.5-3g,疗程 24 周;CYC 治疗方案为每两周静脉滴注 500mg,共 6 次。所有患者接受 3 次甲泼尼龙冲击治疗,随后给予口服皮质激素。诱导治疗结束时开始给予硫唑嘌呤和低剂量皮质激素维持治疗。主要终点为 24 周时的治疗反应,次要终点为完全缓解、系统性红斑狼疮疾病活动指数和不良事件。173 例入组患者中,100 例被随机分为 CYC 组或 MMF 组,两组患者的基线特征相似,除 CYC 组的 24 小时蛋白尿更高外。24 周时,每组各有 37 例患者达到主要终点。CYC 组完全缓解率为 50%,MMF 组为 54%。接受 MMF 治疗的患者胃肠道症状明显更常见(52% vs. 4%)。然而,其他不良反应相似。因此,在诱导治疗较轻的 LN 时,低剂量静脉 CYC 的安全性和疗效与口服 MMF 相当。

相似文献

1
Comparison of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide with oral mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of lupus nephritis.低剂量静脉注射环磷酰胺与口服吗替麦考酚酯治疗狼疮性肾炎的比较。
Kidney Int. 2016 Jan;89(1):235-42. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.318. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
2
Low dose mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclophosphamide in the induction therapy of lupus nephritis in Nepalese population: a randomized control trial.低剂量霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺用于尼泊尔人群狼疮性肾炎诱导治疗的对比:一项随机对照试验
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0973-7.
3
Mycophenolate mofetil or cyclophosphamide in indian patients with lupus nephritis: Which is better? A single-center experience.霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺治疗印度狼疮性肾炎患者:哪种效果更佳?单中心经验
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2017 Sep-Oct;28(5):1069-1077. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.215147.
4
Mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil or intravenous cyclophosphamide for induction treatment of active lupus nephritis.霉酚酸酯或静脉注射环磷酰胺与米佐菌胺对比,用于治疗活动期狼疮性肾炎的诱导治疗。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(21):3718-23.
5
Rituximab vs mycophenolate and vs cyclophosphamide pulses for induction therapy of active lupus nephritis: a clinical observational study.利妥昔单抗与吗替麦考酚酯和环磷酰胺脉冲治疗狼疮性肾炎活动诱导:一项临床观察研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014 Sep;53(9):1570-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket462. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
6
Induction therapy with short-term high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by mycophenolate mofetil in proliferative lupus nephritis.在增殖性狼疮性肾炎中,采用短期大剂量静脉注射环磷酰胺随后使用霉酚酸酯进行诱导治疗。
Neth J Med. 2014 Nov;72(9):481-90.
7
Mycophenolate mofetil in induction and maintenance therapy of severe lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.霉酚酸酯在重症狼疮性肾炎诱导和维持治疗中的应用:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Jul;22(7):1933-42. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm066. Epub 2007 Apr 3.
8
Should mycophenolate mofetil replace cyclophosphamide as first-line therapy for severe lupus nephritis?霉酚酸酯是否应替代环磷酰胺作为重度狼疮肾炎的一线治疗药物?
Kidney Int. 2012 Dec;82(12):1256-60. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.203. Epub 2012 May 30.
9
Tacrolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil for induction therapy of lupus nephritis: a randomised controlled trial and long-term follow-up.他克莫司与霉酚酸酯治疗狼疮性肾炎诱导缓解的随机对照试验及长期随访
Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):30-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-206456. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
10
Long-term outcomes of lupus nephritis treated with regimens based on cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil.基于环磷酰胺和霉酚酸酯的方案治疗狼疮肾炎的长期结局。
Lupus. 2020 Jul;29(8):845-853. doi: 10.1177/0961203320926256. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in precision medicine for lupus nephritis: biomarker- and AI-driven diagnosis and treatment response prediction and targeted therapies.狼疮性肾炎精准医学的进展:生物标志物和人工智能驱动的诊断、治疗反应预测及靶向治疗
EBioMedicine. 2025 Jun 3;117:105785. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105785.
2
Disease-Modifying Therapies in Lupus Nephritis: A Narrative Review Evaluating Currently Used Pharmacologic Agents.狼疮性肾炎的疾病修饰疗法:一项评估当前使用的药物制剂的叙述性综述
Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Jun;12(3):421-434. doi: 10.1007/s40744-025-00752-y. Epub 2025 Apr 5.
3
The Efficacy of Induction Treatment with a Cyclophosphamide- or Mycophenolate Mofetil-Based Regimen for Active Lupus Nephritis in Thailand: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
泰国环磷酰胺或霉酚酸酯诱导治疗活动性狼疮性肾炎的疗效:一项回顾性队列研究
Glomerular Dis. 2025 Feb 28;5(1):151-157. doi: 10.1159/000545014. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Lupus nephritis randomised controlled trials: evidence gaps and under-represented groups.狼疮性肾炎随机对照试验:证据空白与代表性不足的群体
Lupus Sci Med. 2024 Dec 20;11(2):e001331. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2024-001331.
5
Omics-Driven Strategies for Developing Saline-Smart Lentils: A Comprehensive Review.基于组学的耐盐型绿豆研发策略:综述
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 22;25(21):11360. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111360.
6
Prior elicitation of the efficacy and tolerability of Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Juvenile Localised Scleroderma.甲氨蝶呤和霉酚酸酯在青少年局限性硬皮病中的疗效和耐受性的预先诱导。
AMRC Open Res. 2021 Sep 9;3:20. doi: 10.12688/amrcopenres.13008.1. eCollection 2021.
7
Managing Lupus Nephritis in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年狼疮肾炎的管理。
Paediatr Drugs. 2024 Mar;26(2):145-161. doi: 10.1007/s40272-023-00609-3. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
8
The efficacy of immunosuppressive drugs induction therapy for lupus nephritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.免疫抑制药物诱导治疗狼疮性肾炎的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Ren Fail. 2023;45(2):2290365. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2290365. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
9
Management of Lupus Nephritis: New Treatments and Updated Guidelines.狼疮肾炎的治疗:新疗法和更新的指南。
Kidney360. 2023 Oct 1;4(10):1503-1511. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000230.
10
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil and Cyclophosphamide in Lupus Nephritis: Evidence from a Real-World Study.霉酚酸酯与环磷酰胺治疗狼疮性肾炎的有效性和安全性比较:一项真实世界研究的证据
Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Oct;10(5):1199-1213. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00572-y. Epub 2023 Jul 7.