Zhang Meiying, Zhuang Guanglei, Sun Xiangjun, Shen Yanying, Zhao Aimin, Di Wen
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Gynecologic Oncology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
J Ovarian Res. 2015 Oct 21;8:67. doi: 10.1186/s13048-015-0195-6.
A high-quality risk prediction model is urgently needed for the clinical management of ovarian cancer. However most existing models are solely based on clinical parameters, and molecular classifications in recent reports are still being debated. This study aimed to establish a risk prediction model by using both clinicopathological and molecular factors (the synthetic model) for epithelial ovarian cancer.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in epithelial ovarian cancer patients (n = 161) treated with primary debulking surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. The expression level of 15 selected molecular markers were measured using immunohistochemistry. A risk model was developed using COX regression analysis with overall survival as the primary outcome. A simplified scoring system for each prognostic factor was based on its coefficient. Independent validation (n = 40) was conducted to evaluate the performance of the model.
A total of 10 out of 15 molecular markers were significantly associated with clinical characteristics and overall survival. The synthetic model performed better than the clinicopathological risk model or the molecular risk model alone, as assessed by analysis of the receiver-operating characteristics curve area and the Youden index. The synthetic model included parity (>3), peritoneal metastasis, stage, tumor type, residual disease, and expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), breast cancer 1 (BRCA1), murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) and Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS).
Our synthetic risk model may more accurately predict survival of epithelial ovarian cancer patients than current models.
卵巢癌的临床管理迫切需要一个高质量的风险预测模型。然而,大多数现有模型仅基于临床参数,近期报道中的分子分类仍存在争议。本研究旨在通过使用临床病理和分子因素(综合模型)建立上皮性卵巢癌的风险预测模型。
对接受初次肿瘤细胞减灭术和辅助化疗的上皮性卵巢癌患者(n = 161)进行回顾性队列研究。使用免疫组织化学测量15种选定分子标志物的表达水平。以总生存期作为主要结局,采用COX回归分析建立风险模型。每个预后因素的简化评分系统基于其系数。进行独立验证(n = 40)以评估模型的性能。
15种分子标志物中有10种与临床特征和总生存期显著相关。通过分析受试者工作特征曲线面积和尤登指数评估,综合模型的表现优于单独的临床病理风险模型或分子风险模型。综合模型包括产次(>3)、腹膜转移、分期、肿瘤类型、残留病灶以及人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)、表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)、乳腺癌1(BRCA1)、鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B(BRAF)和 Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物(KRAS)的表达。
我们的综合风险模型可能比当前模型更准确地预测上皮性卵巢癌患者的生存期。