Glass Stephen M, Ross Scott E
Balance Analysis and Training Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Oct;10(5):612-21.
Failure to meet minimum performance standards is a leading cause of attrition from basic combat training. A standardized assessment such as the Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) could help identify movement behaviors relevant to physical performance in tactical occupations. Previous work has demonstrated only marginal association between FMS™ tests and performance outcomes, but adding a load challenge to this movement assessment may help highlight performance-limiting behaviors.
The purposes of this investigation were to quantify the effect of load on FMS™ tests and determine the extent to which performance outcomes could be predicted using scores from both loaded and unloaded FMS™ conditions.
Crossover Trial.
Thirteen female and six male recreationally active college students (21 ± 1.37 years, 168 ± 9.8 cm, 66 ± 12.25 kg) completed the FMS™ under (1) a control condition (FMS™C), and (2) an 18.10kg weight vest condition (FMS™W). Balance was assessed using a force plate in double-legged stance and tactical physical performance was evaluated via completion times in a battery of field tests. For each condition, penalized regression was used to select models from the seven FMS™ component tests to predict balance and performance outcomes. Data were collected during a single session lasting approximately three hours per participant.
For balance, significant predictors were identified from both conditions but primarily predicted poorer balance with increasing FMS™ scores. For tactical performance, models were retained almost exclusively from FMS™W and generally predicted better performance with higher item scores.
The current results suggest that FMS™ screening with an external load could help predict performance relevant to tactical occupations. Sports medicine and fitness professionals interested in performance outcomes may consider assessing movement behaviors under a load.
未能达到最低表现标准是基础战斗训练中人员流失的主要原因。诸如功能性动作筛查(Functional Movement Screen™,FMS™)之类的标准化评估有助于识别与战术职业身体表现相关的动作行为。先前的研究仅表明FMS™测试与表现结果之间存在微弱关联,但在此动作评估中增加负荷挑战可能有助于凸显限制表现的行为。
本研究旨在量化负荷对FMS™测试的影响,并确定使用加载和未加载FMS™条件下的分数预测表现结果的程度。
交叉试验。
13名女性和6名男性经常参加体育活动的大学生(21±1.37岁,身高168±9.8厘米,体重66±12.25千克)在以下两种条件下完成FMS™测试:(1)对照条件(FMS™C),以及(2)佩戴18.10千克负重背心的条件(FMS™W)。使用测力台评估双腿站立时的平衡,并通过一系列现场测试的完成时间评估战术身体表现。对于每种条件,使用惩罚回归从七个FMS™组件测试中选择模型,以预测平衡和表现结果。每位参与者在大约持续三小时的单次测试中收集数据。
对于平衡,两种条件下均确定了显著的预测因素,但主要预测随着FMS™分数增加平衡能力较差。对于战术表现,模型几乎完全来自FMS™W,并且通常预测项目分数越高表现越好。
目前的结果表明,进行外部负荷下的FMS™筛查有助于预测与战术职业相关的表现。对表现结果感兴趣的运动医学和健身专业人员可能会考虑评估负荷下的动作行为。
3级。