Trindade Matheus A, de Toledo Aline Martins, Cardoso Jefferson Rosa, Souza Igor Eduardo, Dos Santos Mendes Felipe Augusto, Santana Luisiane A, Carregaro Rodrigo Luiz
College of Physical Education (PPGEF), Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasilia/DF, Brazil.
PAIFIT Research Group, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina/PR, Brazil.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Nov;12(6):858-861.
The Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) has been the focus of recent research related to movement profiling and injury prediction. However, there is a paucity of studies examining the associations between physical performance tasks such as balance and the FMS™ screening system.
The purpose of this study was to compare measures of static balance in stable and unstable conditions between different groups divided by FMS™ scores. A secondary purpose was to discern if balance indices discriminate the groups divided by FMS™ scores.
Cross-sectional study.
Fifty-seven physically active subjects (25 men and 32 women; mean age of 22.9 ± 3.1 yrs) participated. The outcome was unilateral stance balance indices, composed by: Anteroposterior Index; Medial-lateral Index, and Overall Balance Index in stable and unstable conditions, as provided by the Biodex balance platform. Subjects were dichotomized into two groups, according to a FMS™ cut-off score of 14: FMS1 (score > 14) and FMS2 (score ≤ 14). The independent Students t-test was used to verify differences in balance indices between FMS1 and FMS2 groups. A discriminant analysis was applied in order to identify which of the balance indices would adequately discriminate the FMS™ groups.
Comparisons between FMS1 and FMS2 groups in the stable and unstable conditions demonstrated a higher unstable Anteroposterior index for FMS2 (p=0.017). No significant differences were found for other comparisons (p>0.05). The indices did not discriminate the FMS™ groups ( > 0.05).
The balance indices adopted in this study were not useful as a parameter for identification and discrimination of healthy subjects assessed by the FMS™.
2c.
功能性动作筛查（FMS™）一直是近期与动作剖析和损伤预测相关研究的焦点。然而，关于平衡等身体表现任务与FMS™筛查系统之间关联的研究却很匮乏。
本研究的目的是比较根据FMS™评分划分的不同组在稳定和不稳定条件下的静态平衡测量值。第二个目的是辨别平衡指标是否能区分根据FMS™评分划分的组。
横断面研究。
57名身体活跃的受试者（25名男性和32名女性；平均年龄22.9±3.1岁）参与研究。结果指标是单侧站立平衡指标，由Biodex平衡平台提供的稳定和不稳定条件下的前后指标、内外侧指标和总体平衡指标组成。根据FMS™临界值14将受试者分为两组：FMS1组（评分>14）和FMS2组（评分≤14）。使用独立样本t检验来验证FMS1组和FMS2组之间平衡指标的差异。应用判别分析以确定哪些平衡指标能充分区分FMS™组。
FMS1组和FMS2组在稳定和不稳定条件下的比较显示，FMS2组在不稳定状态下的前后指标更高（p = 0.017）。其他比较未发现显著差异（p>0.05）。这些指标未能区分FMS™组（p>0.05）。
本研究采用的平衡指标不能作为通过FMS™评估健康受试者的识别和区分参数。
2c。
