Mues Katherine E, Lammie Patrick J, Klein Mitchel, Kleinbaum David G, Addiss David, Fox LeAnne M
Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health and Laney Graduate School, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Parasitic Diseases Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 22;10(10):e0141047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141047. eCollection 2015.
Episodes of acute adenolymphangitis (ADL) are often the first clinical sign of lymphatic filariasis (LF). They are often accompanied by swelling of the affected limb, inflammation, fever, and general malaise and lead to the progression of lymphedema. Although ADL episodes have been studied for a century or more, questions still remain as to their etiology. We quantified antibody levels to pathogens that potentially contribute to ADL episodes during and after an episode among lymphedema patients in Léogâne, Haiti. We estimated the proportion of ADL episodes hypothesized to be attributed to specific pathogens.
We measured antibody levels to specific pathogens during and following an ADL episode among 41 lymphedema patients enrolled in a cohort study in Léogâne, Haiti. We calculated the absolute and relative changes in antibody levels between the ADL and convalescent time points. We calculated the proportion of episodes that demonstrated a two-fold increase in antibody level for several bacterial, fungal, and filarial pathogens.
Our results showed the greatest proportion of two-fold changes in antibody levels for the carbohydrate antigen Streptococcus group A, followed by IgG2 responses to a soluble filarial antigen (BpG2), Streptococcal Pyrogenic Exotoxin B, and an antigen for the fungal pathogen Candida. When comparing the median antibody level during the ADL episode to the median antibody level at the convalescent time point, only the antigens for Pseudomonas species (P-value = 0.0351) and Streptolysin O (P-value = 0.0074) showed a significant result.
Although our results are limited by the lack of a control group and few antibody responses, they provide some evidence for infection with Streptococcus A as a potential contributing factor to ADL episodes. Our results add to the current evidence and illustrate the importance of determining the causal role of bacterial and fungal pathogens and immunological antifilarial response in ADL episodes.
急性腺淋巴管炎(ADL)发作通常是淋巴丝虫病(LF)的首个临床症状。常伴有患肢肿胀、炎症、发热及全身不适,并导致淋巴水肿进展。尽管对ADL发作已研究了一个多世纪,但关于其病因仍存在疑问。我们对海地莱奥甘的淋巴水肿患者在发作期间及发作后针对可能导致ADL发作的病原体的抗体水平进行了量化。我们估计了推测归因于特定病原体的ADL发作比例。
我们在海地莱奥甘一项队列研究中,对41名淋巴水肿患者在ADL发作期间及之后测量了针对特定病原体的抗体水平。我们计算了ADL与恢复期时间点之间抗体水平的绝对和相对变化。我们计算了几种细菌、真菌和丝虫病原体抗体水平呈两倍增加的发作比例。
我们的结果显示,A组链球菌碳水化合物抗原的抗体水平两倍变化比例最大,其次是对可溶性丝虫抗原(BpG₂)、链球菌致热外毒素B及真菌病原体白色念珠菌抗原的IgG₂反应。将ADL发作期间的抗体水平中位数与恢复期时间点的抗体水平中位数进行比较时,仅铜绿假单胞菌属抗原(P值 = 0.0351)和链球菌溶血素O(P值 = 0.0074)显示出显著结果。
尽管我们的结果因缺乏对照组和抗体反应较少而受到限制,但它们为A组链球菌感染作为ADL发作的潜在促成因素提供了一些证据。我们的结果补充了现有证据,并说明了确定细菌和真菌病原体以及免疫抗丝虫反应在ADL发作中的因果作用的重要性。