Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激治疗癫痫的荟萃分析:设备设置参数与急性反应之间的相关性

Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy: correlation between device setting parameters and acute response.

作者信息

Ghani S, Vilensky J, Turner B, Tubbs R S, Loukas M

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.

Department of Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, St. George's University, Grenada, WI, USA.

出版信息

Childs Nerv Syst. 2015 Dec;31(12):2291-304. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2921-1. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive neurophysiological treatment for those patients who have pharmacoresistant or surgically resistant partial onset epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of high and low stimulation paradigms on a responder rate of ≥50 and ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency and associated adverse effects in adults and children.

METHOD

A literature search was performed using Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library for studies using vagus nerve stimulation published from January 1980 until July 2014 for medically or surgically resistant partial onset seizures, in children and adults. No restrictions on languages were imposed.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors reviewed and selected studies for inclusion and exclusion. The search identified five randomized control trials that fit with our inclusion criteria. The following outcomes were evaluated: 50% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, 75% or greater reduction in total seizure frequency, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials were analyzed in this meta-analysis. Results indicate high stimulation is more effective in adult patients who experienced ≥50 and ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency with a significant difference within both high and low stimulation groups. In children, there was no significant difference between the two groups and patients with ≥50 % reduction in seizures. Adverse effects such as hoarseness and dyspnea were more common in the high stimulation group where the remaining side effects were not statistically different among both groups.

CONCLUSION

High stimulation is more effective than low stimulation in producing a greater reduction in seizure frequency in patients with medically and surgically resistant epilepsy.

摘要

背景

迷走神经刺激(VNS)是一种针对药物难治性或手术难治性部分性发作癫痫患者的辅助神经生理学治疗方法。

目的

本研究的目的是确定高刺激和低刺激模式对成人和儿童癫痫发作频率降低≥50%和≥75%的缓解率及相关不良反应的影响。

方法

使用Medline、PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索,以查找1980年1月至2014年7月期间发表的关于使用迷走神经刺激治疗儿童和成人药物或手术难治性部分性发作的研究。未对语言设置限制。

数据收集与分析

四位作者对纳入和排除的研究进行了审查和筛选。检索确定了五项符合我们纳入标准的随机对照试验。评估了以下结果:癫痫发作总频率降低50%或更多、癫痫发作总频率降低75%或更多以及不良反应。

结果

本荟萃分析中分析了四项随机对照试验。结果表明,高刺激对癫痫发作频率降低≥50%和≥75%的成年患者更有效,高刺激组和低刺激组之间存在显著差异。在儿童中,两组之间以及癫痫发作减少≥50%的患者之间没有显著差异。高刺激组中声音嘶哑和呼吸困难等不良反应更为常见,其余不良反应在两组之间无统计学差异。

结论

对于药物和手术难治性癫痫患者,高刺激在降低癫痫发作频率方面比低刺激更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验