Suppr超能文献

迷走神经刺激治疗癫痫:基于证据的方法。

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Epilepsy: An Evidence-Based Approach.

作者信息

Cukiert Arthur

机构信息

Epilepsy Surgery Program, Clinica de Epilepsia de Sao Paulo and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, ABC Faculty of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Prog Neurol Surg. 2015;29:39-52. doi: 10.1159/000434654. Epub 2015 Sep 4.

Abstract

Medical treatment of seizures yields a satisfactory response in 75-80% of the patients; resective epilepsy surgery is a therapeutic option for those patients who are refractory to drug therapy, but there is still a considerable portion (20-30%) of patients who are ineligible for surgery or failed surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) might be an option for these very refractory patients. We carried out an evidence-based search to identify the best evidence presently available related to the use of VNS. We used multiple searchable databases (primary: PubMed-MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and SciELO; secondary: Cochrane Library) and a standard structured approach know as the PICO scheme: P (patient), I (intervention), C (comparison), and O (outcome). Publications were selected based on study design, PICO components, language, and availability of full text. For study design, we included papers designed as 'randomized controlled trials'; these trials were evaluated according to the Jadad score; the type II error was not used while selecting studies to avoid further limitations. Twenty-eight papers were selected, all from PubMed-MEDLINE. The search results showed that patients older than 12 years with refractory partial seizures (with or without generalization) may benefit from VNS. Children might also benefit, but might need different stimulation parameters. We also noted that higher stimulation settings are associated with increased occurrence of hoarseness, throat pain, cough, and dyspnea. The available randomized controlled trials and cohorts made it clear that VNS is a useful palliative procedure in adult patients with partial epilepsy, and a 50-60% reduction in seizure frequency might be expected in at least 50% of the patients. VNS is a useful palliative procedure in patients with refractory epilepsy. As our practical experience and understanding of the mechanism of action of VNS increase, more homogeneous patient populations that might respond better to VNS are being recognized, such as children with secondary generalized epilepsy and some types of reflex epilepsy.

摘要

癫痫的药物治疗能使75%至80%的患者获得满意疗效;对于药物治疗无效的患者,切除性癫痫手术是一种治疗选择,但仍有相当一部分患者(20%至30%)不符合手术条件或手术失败。迷走神经刺激术(VNS)可能是这些极难治疗的患者的一种选择。我们进行了循证检索,以确定目前与VNS使用相关的最佳证据。我们使用了多个可检索数据库(主要数据库:PubMed-MEDLINE、EMBASE、LILACS和SciELO;次要数据库:Cochrane图书馆)以及一种称为PICO方案的标准结构化方法:P(患者)、I(干预措施)、C(对照)和O(结局)。根据研究设计、PICO要素、语言和全文可用性来选择出版物。对于研究设计,我们纳入了设计为“随机对照试验”的论文;这些试验根据Jadad评分进行评估;在选择研究时未使用II类错误,以避免进一步的局限性。共选择了28篇论文,均来自PubMed-MEDLINE。检索结果表明,12岁以上难治性部分性癫痫(伴或不伴全面性发作)患者可能从VNS中获益。儿童也可能获益,但可能需要不同的刺激参数。我们还注意到,较高的刺激设置与声音嘶哑、咽痛、咳嗽和呼吸困难的发生率增加有关。现有的随机对照试验和队列研究明确表明,VNS是成年部分性癫痫患者有用的姑息治疗方法,至少50%的患者癫痫发作频率可能降低50%至60%。VNS是难治性癫痫患者有用的姑息治疗方法。随着我们的实践经验以及对VNS作用机制的理解不断增加,越来越多可能对VNS反应更好的同质化患者群体正在被识别出来,例如继发性全面性癫痫儿童和某些类型的反射性癫痫患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验