Suppr超能文献

测量基层医疗护士的共情、以患者为中心的沟通:咨询与关系共情(CARE)量表的效度和信度

Measuring empathic, person-centred communication in primary care nurses: validity and reliability of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure.

作者信息

Bikker Annemieke P, Fitzpatrick Bridie, Murphy Douglas, Mercer Stewart W

机构信息

General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Horselethill Road, Glasgow, G12 9LX, UK.

School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 23;16:149. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0374-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Empathic patient-centred care is central to high quality health encounters. The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure is a patient-rated experience measure of the interpersonal quality of healthcare encounters. The measure has been extensively validated and is widely used by doctors in primary care but has not been validated in nursing. This study assessed the validity and reliability of the CARE Measure in routine nurse consultations in primary care.

METHODS

Seventeen nurses from nine general medical practices located in three Scottish Health Boards participated in the study. Consecutive patients (aged 16 years or older) were asked to self-complete a questionnaire containing the CARE Measure immediately after their clinical encounter with the nurse. Statistical analysis included Spearman's correlation and principal component analysis (construct validity), Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency), and Generalisability theory (inter-rater reliability).

RESULTS

A total of 774 patients (327 male and 447 female) completed the questionnaire. Almost three out of four patients (73 %) felt that the CARE Measure items were very important to their current consultation. The number of 'not applicable' responses and missing values were low overall (5.7 and 1.6 % respectively). The mean CARE Measure score in the consultations was 45.9 and 48 % achieved the maximum possible score of 50. CARE Measure scores correlated in predicted ways with overall satisfaction and patient enablement in support of convergent and divergent validity. Factor analysis found that the CARE Measure items loaded highly onto a single factor. The measure showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.97) and acceptable inter-rater reliability (G = 0.6 with 60 patients ratings per nurse). The scores were not affected by patients' age, gender, self-perceived overall health, living arrangements, employment status or language spoken at home.

CONCLUSIONS

The CARE Measure has high face and construct validity, and internal reliability in nurse consultations in primary care. Its ability to discriminate between nurses is sufficient for educational and quality improvement purposes.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的共情护理是高质量医疗服务的核心。咨询与关系共情(CARE)量表是一种由患者评定的医疗服务人际质量体验量表。该量表已得到广泛验证,在基层医疗中被医生广泛使用,但尚未在护理领域得到验证。本研究评估了CARE量表在基层医疗常规护理咨询中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

来自苏格兰三个卫生委员会的九个全科医疗诊所的17名护士参与了本研究。连续就诊的患者(年龄16岁及以上)在与护士进行临床接触后,立即被要求自行填写一份包含CARE量表的问卷。统计分析包括斯皮尔曼相关性分析和主成分分析(结构效度)、克朗巴哈系数(内部一致性)和概化理论(评分者间信度)。

结果

共有774名患者(327名男性和447名女性)完成了问卷。近四分之三的患者(73%)认为CARE量表项目对他们当前的咨询非常重要。总体而言,“不适用”回答和缺失值的数量较低(分别为5.7%和1.6%)。咨询中的CARE量表平均得分为45.9分,48%的患者达到了最高可能得分50分。CARE量表得分与总体满意度和患者赋能以预期方式相关,支持聚合效度和区分效度。因子分析发现,CARE量表项目高度载荷于一个单一因子上。该量表显示出高内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数 = 0.97)和可接受的评分者间信度(G = 0.6,每位护士有60名患者评分)。得分不受患者年龄、性别、自我感知的总体健康状况、生活安排、就业状况或在家中使用的语言影响。

结论

CARE量表在基层医疗护理咨询中具有较高的表面效度和结构效度以及内部信度。其区分护士的能力足以用于教育和质量改进目的。

相似文献

2
Assessing the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in sexual health nurses' consultations.
BMC Nurs. 2017 Nov 25;16:71. doi: 10.1186/s12912-017-0265-8. eCollection 2017.
3
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CARE measure in a general medicine outpatient setting.
Fam Pract. 2014 Feb;31(1):118-26. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt053. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy Measure in primary care.
Fam Pract. 2017 Feb;34(1):119-124. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw116. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
6
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CARE Measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong.
Fam Pract. 2009 Oct;26(5):398-406. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp044. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
7
Measuring empathy in pediatrics: validation of the Visual CARE measure.
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1050-x.
10
Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice.
Fam Pract. 2005 Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh730. Epub 2005 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and Associated Factors of Burnout Among Nurses at Private Tertiary Hospitals in the Gulf Region: A Cross-Sectional Multicenter Study.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jul 6;11:23779608251350578. doi: 10.1177/23779608251350578. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
6
Students' self-perception of empathy in caring.
Curationis. 2023 Jun 23;46(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v46i1.2364.
7
Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 26;22(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03478-5.
8
Arabic Validity of the (CARE) Measure for Improving Medical and Mental Health Services.
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 18;2022:6530019. doi: 10.1155/2022/6530019. eCollection 2022.
9
From patient outcomes to system change: Evaluating the impact of VHA's implementation of the Whole Health System of Care.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13938. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
10
Bridging the Gap for Children With Compound Health Challenges: An Intervention Protocol.
Front Pediatr. 2021 Dec 22;9:721926. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.721926. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the CARE measure in a general medicine outpatient setting.
Fam Pract. 2014 Feb;31(1):118-26. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmt053. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
4
A systematic review of the associations between empathy measures and patient outcomes in cancer care.
Psychooncology. 2012 Dec;21(12):1255-64. doi: 10.1002/pon.2115. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
5
A systematic review of the reliability of objective structured clinical examination scores.
Med Educ. 2011 Dec;45(12):1181-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04075.x. Epub 2011 Oct 11.
6
The effect of patient feedback on physicians' consultation skills: a systematic review.
Acad Med. 2011 Nov;86(11):1426-36. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182312162.
7
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CARE Measure in a primary care setting in Hong Kong.
Fam Pract. 2009 Oct;26(5):398-406. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp044. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
9
Measurement of empathy in nursing research: systematic review.
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Dec;64(5):440-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04831.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验