Arigliani Michele, Castriotta Luigi, Pusiol Anna, Titolo Annachiara, Petoello Enrico, Brun Peressut Alberto, Miorin Elisabetta, Elkina Iana, Marzona Federico, Cucchiaro Davide, Spanghero Elisa, Pavan Matteo, Arigliani Raffaele, Mercer Stewart W, Cogo Paola
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medical Sciences, Unit of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Udine, ASUI Udine, Pediatria, P.zzale S. Maria Misericordia 1, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Institute of Hygiene and Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital of Udine, ASUI Udine, Istituto Igiene, P.zzale S. Maria Misericordia 1, 33100, Udine, Italy.
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1050-x.
Empathy is a key element of "Patient and Family Centered Care", a clinical approach recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics. However, there is a lack of validated tools to evaluate paediatrician empathy. This study aimed to validate the Visual CARE Measure, a patient rated questionnaire measuring physician empathy, in the setting of a Pediatric Emergency Department (ED).
The empathy of physicians working in the Pediatric ED of the University Hospital of Udine, Italy, was assessed using an Italian translation of the Visual Care Measure. This test has three versions suited to different age groups: the 5Q questionnaire was administered to children aged 7-11, the 10Q version to those older than 11, and the 10Q-Parent questionnaire to parents of children younger than 7. The internal reliability, homogeneity and construct validity of the 5Q and 10Q/10Q-Parent versions of the Visual Care Measure, were separately assessed. The influence of family background on the rating of physician empathy and satisfaction with the clinical encounter was also evaluated.
Seven physicians and 416 children and their parents were included in the study. Internal consistency measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 for the 10Q/10Q-Parent versions and 0.88 for the 5Q version. The item-total correlation was > 0.75 for each item. An exploratory factor analysis showed that all the items load onto the first factor. Physicians' empathy scores correlated with patients' satisfaction for both the 10Q and 10Q-Parent questionnaires (Spearman's rho = 0.7189; p < 0.001) and for the 5Q questionnaire (Spearman's rho = 0.5968; p < 0,001). Trust in the consulting physician was lower among immigrant parents (OR 0.43. 95% CI 0.20-0.93).
The Visual Care Measure is a reliable second-person test of physician empathy in the setting of a Pediatric Emergency Room. More studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of this instrument in other pediatric settings distinct from the Emergency Room and to further evaluate its utility in measuring the impact of communication and empathy training programmes for healthcare professionals working in pediatrics.
同理心是“以患者和家庭为中心的医疗护理”的关键要素,这是美国儿科学会推荐的一种临床方法。然而,目前缺乏经过验证的工具来评估儿科医生的同理心。本研究旨在验证视觉关怀量表,这是一种由患者对医生同理心进行评分的问卷,用于儿科急诊科。
使用视觉关怀量表的意大利语翻译版本,对意大利乌迪内大学医院儿科急诊科的医生的同理心进行评估。该测试有三个适用于不同年龄组的版本:5Q问卷用于7至11岁的儿童,10Q版本用于11岁以上的儿童,10Q-家长问卷用于7岁以下儿童的家长。分别评估了视觉关怀量表5Q和10Q/10Q-家长版本的内部信度、同质性和结构效度。还评估了家庭背景对医生同理心评分以及对临床诊疗满意度的影响。
该研究纳入了7名医生以及416名儿童及其家长。10Q/10Q-家长版本通过克朗巴哈系数测量的内部一致性为0.95,5Q版本为0.88。每个项目的项目-总分相关性均>0.75。探索性因素分析表明,所有项目均加载到第一个因素上。对于10Q和10Q-家长问卷以及5Q问卷,医生的同理心得分与患者的满意度均相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分别为0.7189;p<0.001以及0.5968;p<0.001)。移民家长对会诊医生的信任度较低(比值比0.43,95%置信区间0.20-0.93)。
视觉关怀量表是在儿科急诊室环境中对医生同理心进行可靠的第二人称测试。需要更多研究来评估该工具在急诊室外其他儿科环境中的可靠性,并进一步评估其在衡量针对儿科医疗专业人员的沟通和同理心培训项目影响方面的效用。