Tunbridge F K, Newens A, Home P D, Davis S N, Murphy M, Burrin J M, Alberti K G, Jensen I
Department of Medicine, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Diabetes Care. 1989 Feb;12(2):115-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.12.2.115.
Isophane (NPH) and lente insulin preparations have been the basis of insulin-injection regimens for many decades but were never formally compared. After a 2-mo run-in period, 82 patients were randomized to NPH (Protaphane) or lente (Monotard) insulin preparations given together with Actrapid as a twice-daily injection regimen in a double-blind study. Patients were seen monthly and crossed over after 5 mo of treatment. Control as assessed by glycosylated hemoglobin (NPH 9.2 +/- 0.1%, lente 9.3 +/- 0.1%, mean +/- SE) and fructosamine (1.55 +/- 0.02 and 1.57 +/- 0.02 mM) concentrations was identical for the two regimens as were home-collected laboratory-measured fasting blood glucose (BG) (NPH 8.8 +/- 0.5 mM, lente 9.0 +/- 0.5 mM) and mean BG (8.2 +/- 0.3 and 7.6 +/- 0.3 mM) concentrations. For both regimens, the major control problem was the BG concentration before and after breakfast. Total insulin dosage was similar (NPH 56.3 +/- 0.6 U/day, lente 57.2 +/- 0.6 U/day) with no tendency for a difference in the evening intermediate-acting dose (NPH 17.0 +/- 0.3 U/day, lente 17.0 +/- 0.3 U/day) to counter fasting hyperglycemia. Serum lipid concentrations and body weight confirmed the equivalence of control. Hypoglycemic events were recorded in personal diaries and graded by predetermined criteria. Self-treated, relative-assisted, and hospital/doctor-treated hypoglycemic events did not differ in frequency. We conclude that lente- and NPH-based twice-daily human insulin regimens give indistinguishable metabolic control.
数十年来,低精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)和慢胰岛素制剂一直是胰岛素注射治疗方案的基础,但从未进行过正式比较。在为期2个月的导入期后,82例患者被随机分为接受NPH(诺和灵N)或慢胰岛素(单时相胰岛素)制剂治疗组,在一项双盲研究中,这两种制剂均与普通胰岛素一起每日注射两次。每月对患者进行检查,并在治疗5个月后进行交叉治疗。通过糖化血红蛋白(NPH为9.2±0.1%,慢胰岛素为9.3±0.1%,均值±标准误)和果糖胺(分别为1.55±0.02和1.57±0.02 mM)浓度评估的两种治疗方案的血糖控制情况相同,家庭采集的实验室测量的空腹血糖(BG)(NPH为8.8±0.5 mM,慢胰岛素为9.0±0.5 mM)和平均血糖(分别为8.2±0.3和7.6±0.3 mM)浓度也是如此。对于两种治疗方案,主要的血糖控制问题都是早餐前后的血糖浓度。总胰岛素剂量相似(NPH为56.3±0.6 U/天,慢胰岛素为57.2±0.6 U/天),且晚间中效剂量(NPH为17.0±0.3 U/天,慢胰岛素为17.0±0.3 U/天)在对抗空腹高血糖方面没有差异趋势。血清脂质浓度和体重证实了血糖控制的等效性。低血糖事件记录在个人日记中,并根据预定标准进行分级。自我治疗、相对辅助治疗和医院/医生治疗的低血糖事件在频率上没有差异。我们得出结论,基于慢胰岛素和NPH的每日两次人胰岛素治疗方案在代谢控制方面没有显著差异。