Schumacher Anett, Vlassov Ekaterina, Ito Rutsuko
Department of Psychology (Scarborough), University of Toronto, Canada.
Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Hippocampus. 2016 Apr;26(4):530-42. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22542. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
The resolution of an approach-avoidance conflict induced by ambivalent information involves the appraisal of the incentive value of the outcomes and associated stimuli to orchestrate an appropriate behavioral response. Much research has been directed at delineating the neural circuitry underlying approach motivation and avoidance motivation separately. Very little research, however, has examined the neural substrates engaged at the point of decision making when opposing incentive motivations are experienced simultaneously. We hereby examine the role of the dorsal and ventral hippocampus (HPC) in a novel approach-avoidance decision making paradigm, revisiting a once popular theory of HPC function, which posited the HPC to be the driving force of a behavioral inhibition system that is activated in situations of imminent threat. Rats received pre-training excitotoxic lesions of the dorsal or ventral HPC, and were trained to associate different non-spatial cues with appetitive, aversive and neutral outcomes in three separate arms of the radial maze. On the final day of testing, a state of approach-avoidance conflict was induced by simultaneously presenting two cues of opposite valences, and comparing the time the rats spent interacting with the superimposed 'conflict' cue, and the neutral cue. The ventral HPC-lesioned group showed significant preference for the conflict cue over the neutral cue, compared to the dorsal HPC-lesioned, and control groups. Thus, we provide evidence that the ventral, but not dorsal HPC, is a crucial component of the neural circuitry concerned with exerting inhibitory control over approach tendencies under circumstances in which motivational conflict is experienced.
由矛盾信息引发的趋避冲突的解决涉及对结果及相关刺激的激励价值进行评估,以精心策划适当的行为反应。许多研究一直致力于分别描绘趋化动机和回避动机背后的神经回路。然而,很少有研究考察在同时体验到相反激励动机时决策点所涉及的神经基质。我们在此通过一种新颖的趋避决策范式来研究背侧和腹侧海马体(HPC)的作用,重新审视一种曾经流行的HPC功能理论,该理论认为HPC是在迫在眉睫的威胁情况下被激活的行为抑制系统的驱动力。大鼠接受背侧或腹侧HPC的预训练兴奋性毒性损伤,并在放射状迷宫的三个不同臂中接受训练,将不同的非空间线索与奖励性、厌恶性和中性结果联系起来。在测试的最后一天,通过同时呈现两个具有相反效价的线索来诱发趋避冲突状态,并比较大鼠与叠加的“冲突”线索和中性线索互动所花费的时间。与背侧HPC损伤组和对照组相比,腹侧HPC损伤组对冲突线索的偏好显著高于中性线索。因此,我们提供的证据表明,在经历动机冲突的情况下,腹侧而非背侧HPC是与对趋近倾向施加抑制控制相关的神经回路的关键组成部分。