Lotta Luca A, Abbasi Ali, Sharp Stephen J, Sahlqvist Anna-Stina, Waterworth Dawn, Brosnan Julia M, Scott Robert A, Langenberg Claudia, Wareham Nicholas J
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, U.K.
MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, U.K. Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Diabetes Care. 2015 Nov;38(11):2177-87. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1218.
Various definitions of metabolic health have been proposed to explain differences in the risk of type 2 diabetes within BMI categories. The goal of this study was to assess their predictive relevance.
We performed systematic searches of MEDLINE records for prospective cohort studies of type 2 diabetes risk in categories of BMI and metabolic health. In a two-stage meta-analysis, relative risks (RRs) specific to each BMI category were derived by network meta-analysis and the resulting RRs of each study were pooled using random-effects models. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess predictive performance.
In a meta-analysis of 140,845 participants and 5,963 incident cases of type 2 diabetes from 14 cohort studies, classification as metabolically unhealthy was associated with higher RR of diabetes in all BMI categories (lean RR compared with healthy individuals 4.0 [95% CI 3.0-5.1], overweight 3.4 [2.8-4.3], and obese 2.5 [2.1-3.0]). Metabolically healthy obese individuals had a high absolute risk of type 2 diabetes (10-year cumulative incidence 3.1% [95% CI 2.6-3.5]). Current binary definitions of metabolic health had high specificity (pooled estimate 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.91]) but low sensitivity (0.40 [0.31-0.49]) in lean individuals and satisfactory sensitivity (0.81 [0.76-0.86]) but low specificity (0.42 [0.35-0.49]) in obese individuals. However, positive (<3.3 in all BMI categories) and negative (>0.4) likelihood ratios were consistent with insignificant to small improvements in prediction.
Although individuals classified as metabolically unhealthy have a higher RR of type 2 diabetes compared with individuals classified as healthy in all BMI categories, current binary definitions of metabolic health have limited relevance to the prediction of future type 2 diabetes.
为解释体重指数(BMI)类别中2型糖尿病风险的差异,人们提出了各种代谢健康的定义。本研究的目的是评估它们的预测相关性。
我们对MEDLINE记录进行了系统检索,以查找BMI和代谢健康类别中2型糖尿病风险的前瞻性队列研究。在两阶段的荟萃分析中,通过网络荟萃分析得出每个BMI类别的相对风险(RRs),并使用随机效应模型汇总每项研究的RRs结果。使用分层汇总接受者操作特征曲线来评估预测性能。
在对14项队列研究中的140,845名参与者和5,963例2型糖尿病发病病例进行的荟萃分析中,在所有BMI类别中,代谢不健康的分类与糖尿病的RRs较高相关(与健康个体相比,消瘦个体的RR为4.0 [95% CI 3.0 - 5.1],超重个体为3.4 [2.8 - 4.3],肥胖个体为2.5 [2.1 - 3.0])。代谢健康的肥胖个体患2型糖尿病的绝对风险较高(10年累积发病率3.1% [95% CI 2.6 - 3.5])。当前代谢健康的二元定义在消瘦个体中具有较高的特异性(汇总估计值0.88 [95% CI 0.84 - 0.91])但敏感性较低(0.40 [0.31 - 0.49]),在肥胖个体中具有令人满意的敏感性(0.81 [0.76 - 0.86])但特异性较低(0.42 [0.35 - 0.49])。然而,阳性(所有BMI类别中<3.3)和阴性(>0.4)似然比与预测方面微不足道到微小的改善一致。
尽管与所有BMI类别中被分类为健康的个体相比,被分类为代谢不健康的个体患2型糖尿病的RRs更高,但当前代谢健康的二元定义与未来2型糖尿病的预测相关性有限。