Huang Hui, Dai Hua Ping, Kang Jian, Chen Bao Yuan, Sun Tie Ying, Xu Zuo Jun
From the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (HH, ZJX); Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing (HPD); Department of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang (JK); Department of Respiratory Diseases, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin (BYC); and Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China (TYS).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1600. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001600.
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) lacks effective treatment. Pirfenidone has been used to treat IPF patients. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) exerts antioxidant and antifibrotic effects on IPF cases.This study is a double-blind, modified placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of pirfenidone in Chinese IPF patients. We randomly assigned the enrolled Chinese IPF patients with mild to moderate impairment of pulmonary function to receive either oral pirfenidone (1800 mg per day) and NAC (1800 mg per day) or placebo and NAC (1800 mg per day) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were the changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) and walking distance and the lowest SPO2 during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at week 48. The key secondary endpoint was the progression-free survival time. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as number NCT01504334.Eighty-six patients were screened, and 76 cases were enrolled (pirfenidone + NAC: 38; placebo + NAC: 38). The effect of pirfenidone treatment was significant at the 24th week, but this effect did not persist to the 48th week. At the 24th week, the mean decline in both FVC and ΔSPO2 (%) during the 6MWT in the pirfenidone group was lower than that in the control group (-0.08 ± 0.20 L vs -0.22 ± 0.29 L, P = 0.02 and -3.44% ± 4.51% vs -6.29% ± 6.06%, P = 0.03, respectively). However, there was no significant difference between these 2 groups at the 48th week (-0.15 ± 0.25 L vs -0.25 ± 0.28 L, P = 0.11 and -4.25% ± 7.27% vs -5.31% ± 5.49%, P = 0.51, respectively). The pirfenidone treatment group did not achieve the maximal distance difference on the 6MWT at either the 24th or the 48th week. But pirfenidone treatment prolonged the progression-free survival time in the IPF patients (hazard ratio = 1.88, 95% confidence interval: 1.092-3.242, P = 0.02). In the pirfenidone group, the adverse event (AE) rate (52.63%) was higher than that in the control group (26.3%, P = 0.03). Rash was more common in the pirfenidone group (39.5% vs 13.2%, P = 0.02).Compared with placebo combined with high-dose NAC, pirfenidone combined with high-dose NAC prolonged the progression-free survival of Chinese IPF patients with mild to moderate impairment of pulmonary function. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01504334).
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)缺乏有效的治疗方法。吡非尼酮已被用于治疗IPF患者。N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)对IPF病例具有抗氧化和抗纤维化作用。本研究是一项针对中国IPF患者的吡非尼酮双盲、改良安慰剂对照、随机II期试验。我们将入选的轻度至中度肺功能损害的中国IPF患者随机分为两组,分别接受口服吡非尼酮(每日1800毫克)和NAC(每日1800毫克)或安慰剂和NAC(每日1800毫克)治疗,为期48周。主要终点是第48周时用力肺活量(FVC)、步行距离的变化以及6分钟步行试验(6MWT)期间的最低血氧饱和度(SPO2)。关键次要终点是无进展生存期。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT01504334。共筛选了86例患者,76例入组(吡非尼酮+NAC组:38例;安慰剂+NAC组:38例)。吡非尼酮治疗的效果在第24周时显著,但该效果未持续到第48周。在第24周时,吡非尼酮组6MWT期间FVC和ΔSPO2(%)的平均下降幅度低于对照组(-0.08±0.20升对-0.22±0.29升,P=0.02;-3.44%±4.51%对-6.29%±6.06%,P=0.03)。然而,在第48周时,这两组之间无显著差异(-0.15±0.25升对-0.25±0.28升,P=0.11;-4.25%±7.27%对-5.31%±5.49%,P=0.51)。吡非尼酮治疗组在第24周或第48周时在6MWT上均未实现最大距离差异。但吡非尼酮治疗延长了IPF患者的无进展生存期(风险比=1.88,95%置信区间:1.092 - 3.242,P=0.02)。在吡非尼酮组中,不良事件(AE)发生率(52.63%)高于对照组(26.3%,P=0.03)。皮疹在吡非尼酮组中更常见(39.5%对13.2%,P=0.02)。与安慰剂联合高剂量NAC相比,吡非尼酮联合高剂量NAC延长了轻度至中度肺功能损害的中国IPF患者的无进展生存期。(ClinicalTrials.gov注册号,NCT01504334)