Tidière Morgane, Gaillard Jean-Michel, Müller Dennis W H, Lackey Laurie Bingaman, Gimenez Olivier, Clauss Marcus, Lemaître Jean-François
CNRS, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, F-69622, Université Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France.
Zoological Garden Halle (Saale), Fasanenstr. 5a, 06114, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Evolution. 2015 Dec;69(12):3123-40. doi: 10.1111/evo.12801. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
In most mammals, both sexes display different survival patterns, often involving faster senescence in males. Being under intense sexual competition to secure mating opportunities, males of polygynous species allocate resources to costly behaviors and conspicuous sexual traits, which might explain these observed differences in longevity and senescence patterns. However, comparative studies performed to date have led to conflicting results. We aimed to resolve this problem by first reviewing case studies of the relationship between the strength of sexual selection and age-specific survival metrics. Then, we performed a comprehensive comparative analysis to test whether such relationships exist among species of captive ruminants. We found that the strength of sexual selection negatively influenced the onset of actuarial senescence in males, with males senescing earlier in polygynous than in monogamous species, which led to reduced male longevity in polygynous species. Moreover, males of territorial species senesced earlier but slower, and have a shorter longevity than males of species displaying other mating tactics. We detected little influence of the strength of sexual selection on the rate of actuarial senescence. Our findings demonstrate that the onset of actuarial senescence, rather than its rate, is a side effect of physiological mechanisms linked to sexual selection, and potentially accounts for observed differences in longevity.
在大多数哺乳动物中,两性呈现出不同的生存模式,通常雄性衰老速度更快。由于在激烈的性竞争中获取交配机会,一夫多妻制物种的雄性将资源分配到代价高昂的行为和引人注目的性特征上,这或许可以解释观察到的寿命和衰老模式差异。然而,迄今为止进行的比较研究得出了相互矛盾的结果。我们旨在通过首先回顾性选择强度与特定年龄生存指标之间关系的案例研究来解决这一问题。然后,我们进行了全面的比较分析,以测试圈养反刍动物物种之间是否存在这种关系。我们发现,性选择强度对雄性精算衰老的开始有负面影响,一夫多妻制物种中的雄性比一夫一妻制物种中的雄性衰老更早,这导致一夫多妻制物种中雄性寿命缩短。此外,领地性物种的雄性衰老更早但速度较慢,并且比表现出其他交配策略的物种的雄性寿命更短。我们检测到性选择强度对精算衰老速率几乎没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,精算衰老的开始而非其速率,是与性选择相关的生理机制的副作用,并可能解释了观察到的寿命差异。