Papadogiannis D, Tolidis K, Gerasimou P, Lakes R, Papadogiannis Y
Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Greece.
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Dent Mater. 2015 Dec;31(12):1533-41. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
The aim of this study was to investigate the viscoelastic properties and creep behavior of bulk fill composites under different conditions and evaluate their degree of conversion.
Seven bulk fill composites were examined: everX Posterior (EV), SDR (SD), SonicFill (SF), Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill (TE), Venus Bulk Fill (VE), x-tra base (XB) and x-tra fil (XF). Each material was tested at 21°C, 37°C and 50°C under dry and wet conditions by applying a constant torque for static and creep testing and dynamic torsional loading for dynamic testing. Degree of conversion (%DC) was measured on the top and bottom surfaces of composites with ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni's post hoc test and Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Shear modulus G ranged from 2.17GPa (VE) to 8.03GPa (XF) and flexural modulus E from 6.16GPa (VE) to 23GPa (XF) when the materials were tested dry at 21°C. The increase of temperature and the presence of water lead to a decline of these properties. Flowable materials used as base composites in restorations showed significantly lower values (p<0.05) than non-base composites, while being more prone to creep deformation. %DC ranged from 47.25% (XF) to 66.67% (SD) at the top material surface and 36.06% (XF) to 63.20% (SD) at the bottom.
Bulk fill composites exhibited significant differences between them with base flowable materials showing in most cases inferior mechanical properties and higher degree of conversion than restorative bulk fill materials.
本研究旨在探究不同条件下大块充填复合树脂的粘弹性特性和蠕变行为,并评估其固化转化率。
检测了七种大块充填复合树脂:everX Posterior(EV)、SDR(SD)、SonicFill(SF)、Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill(TE)、Venus Bulk Fill(VE)、x-tra base(XB)和x-tra fil(XF)。每种材料在21°C、37°C和50°C的干燥和潮湿条件下进行测试,通过施加恒定扭矩进行静态和蠕变测试,以及动态扭转加载进行动态测试。使用衰减全反射傅里叶变换红外光谱法(ATR-FTIR)测量复合树脂顶面和底面的固化转化率(%DC)。采用双向方差分析、Bonferroni事后检验和Pearson相关系数进行统计分析。
当材料在21°C干燥条件下测试时,剪切模量G范围为2.17GPa(VE)至8.03GPa(XF),弯曲模量E范围为6.16GPa(VE)至23GPa(XF)。温度升高和水的存在会导致这些性能下降。用作修复体基底复合材料的可流动材料显示出的值显著低于非基底复合材料(p<0.05),同时更易于发生蠕变变形。材料顶面的%DC范围为47.25%(XF)至66.67%(SD),底面为36.06%(XF)至63.20%(SD)。
大块充填复合树脂之间存在显著差异,基底可流动材料在大多数情况下显示出比修复性大块充填材料更低的机械性能和更高的固化转化率。