Arleo Elizabeth Kagan, Bluth Edward, Francavilla Michael, Straus Christopher M, Reddy Sravanthi, Recht Michael
New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Feb;13(2):188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
The aim of this study was to survey fourth-year medical students, both those choosing and those not choosing diagnostic radiology as their specialty, regarding factors influencing their choice of specialty and their perceptions of radiology.
A voluntary anonymous online survey hyperlink was sent to 141 US medical schools for distribution to fourth-year students. Topics included demographics, radiology education, specialty choice and influencing factors, and opinions of radiology.
A representative sampling (7%) of 2015 fourth-year medical students (n = 1,219; 51% men, 49% women) participated: 7% were applying in radiology and 93% were not. For respondents applying in radiology, the most important factor was intellectual challenge. For respondents applying in nonradiology specialties, degree of patient contact was the most important factor in the decision not to choose radiology; job market was not listed as a top-three factor. Women were less likely than men to apply in radiology (P < .001), with radiology selected by 11.8% of men (56 of 476) and only 2.8% of women (13 of 459). Respondents self-identifying as Asian had a significantly higher (P = .015) likelihood of selecting radiology (19 of 156 [12.2%]) than all other races combined (44 of 723 [6.1%]). Respondents at medical schools with required dedicated medical imaging rotations were more likely to choose radiology as a specialty, but most schools still do not require the clerkship (82%).
The reasons fourth-year medical students choose, or do not choose, diagnostic radiology as a specialty are multifactorial, but noncontrollable factors, such as the job market, proved less compelling than controllable factors, such as taking a radiology rotation.
本研究旨在调查四年级医学生,包括那些选择和未选择诊断放射学作为其专业的学生,了解影响他们专业选择的因素以及他们对放射学的看法。
向141所美国医学院发送了一个自愿匿名在线调查超链接,以便分发给四年级学生。主题包括人口统计学、放射学教育、专业选择及影响因素以及对放射学的看法。
2015名四年级医学生中有代表性的样本(7%)(n = 1219;51%为男性,49%为女性)参与了调查:7%的学生申请放射学专业,93%的学生未申请。对于申请放射学专业的受访者来说,最重要的因素是智力挑战。对于申请非放射学专业的受访者来说,与患者接触的程度是决定不选择放射学的最重要因素;就业市场未被列为前三大因素。女性申请放射学专业的可能性低于男性(P <.001),11.8%的男性(476人中的56人)选择放射学专业,而只有2.8%的女性(459人中的13人)选择。自我认定为亚洲人的受访者选择放射学专业的可能性显著高于所有其他种族的总和(P = 0.015)(156人中的19人[12.2%])(723人中的44人[6.1%])。在有专门医学影像轮转要求的医学院就读的受访者更有可能选择放射学作为专业,但大多数学校仍然不要求进行临床实习(82%)。
四年级医学生选择或不选择诊断放射学作为专业的原因是多因素的,但不可控因素,如就业市场,不如可控因素,如参加放射学轮转有说服力。