Ajzen S A, Goldenberg S L, Allen G J, Cooperberg P L, Chan N H, Jones E C
Department of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Radiology. 1989 May;171(2):521-3. doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2649927.
This study was undertaken to evaluate the use of transrectal sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and to compare sonographic with digital guidance for biopsy. In 62 patients in whom prostatic carcinoma was suspected at digital rectal examination, fine-needle aspiration biopsies were performed transperineally under sonographic guidance and transrectally under digital guidance. These patients had 89 nodules, 73 of which were sampled with both techniques. Malignant cells were obtained under digital guidance in 17 of 73 nodules (23%) and under sonographic guidance in 16 (22%). An additional seven nodules, which were not seen sonographically, were sampled under digital guidance and proved to be negative. In nine other nodules that were nonpalpable and evident only with sonography, malignant cells were obtained under sonographic guidance in three. These findings indicate that sonographic guidance for fine-needle aspiration biopsy is as good as digital guidance for palpable lesions.
本研究旨在评估经直肠超声引导下细针穿刺活检的应用,并比较超声引导与指引导向活检的效果。在62例经直肠指检怀疑患有前列腺癌的患者中,在超声引导下经会阴进行细针穿刺活检,并在指引导向下经直肠进行活检。这些患者有89个结节,其中73个结节采用两种技术进行取样。在73个结节中,17个(23%)在指引导向下获取到恶性细胞,16个(22%)在超声引导下获取到恶性细胞。另外7个超声未显示的结节在指引导向下取样,结果为阴性。在另外9个不可触及、仅超声可见的结节中,3个在超声引导下获取到恶性细胞。这些结果表明,对于可触及病变,超声引导下细针穿刺活检与指引导向效果相当。