Suppr超能文献

关于心理学作为内在性学科的荣格派本质的思考:对萨班《误解》的回应

Reflections on the Jungian nature of psychology as the discipline of interiority: a response to Saban's 'Misunderstandings'.

作者信息

Hoedl John

机构信息

Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

J Anal Psychol. 2015 Nov;60(5):698-716. doi: 10.1111/1468-5922.12180.

Abstract

Psychology as the discipline of interiority is the name of the psychology that has developed from Wolfgang Giegerich's work in the field of analytical psychology. This article offers a counterview to that of Mark Saban's claim that Giegerich's psychology is 'irrelevant' to Jungians today and is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of Jungian psychology. It will be shown that, in fact, it is a fundamental misunderstanding of Giegerich's work that has led Saban to form erroneous conclusions. Links between Jung's and Giegerich's conceptions of the 'objective psyche' will be highlighted, along with other examples of how, contrary to Saban's conclusions, psychology as the discipline of interiority has obvious connections to, and grounding in, Jungian psychology.

摘要

作为内在性学科的心理学是从沃尔夫冈·吉格尔里希在分析心理学领域的著作发展而来的心理学名称。本文对马克·萨班的观点提出了反对意见,萨班认为吉格尔里希的心理学在今天与荣格派学者 “无关”,且基于对荣格心理学本质的根本误解。将表明,事实上,正是对吉格尔里希著作的根本误解导致萨班得出了错误结论。将突出荣格和吉格尔里希关于 “客观心灵” 概念之间的联系,以及其他一些例子,说明与萨班的结论相反,作为内在性学科的心理学与荣格心理学有着明显的联系和基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验