• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因检测与经济评估:文献系统综述

Genetic testing and economic evaluations: a systematic review of the literature.

作者信息

D'Andrea Elvira, Marzuillo Carolina, Pelone Ferruccio, De Vito Corrado, Villari Paolo

机构信息

Dip. Sanità pubblica e malattie infettive, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy.

Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Epidemiol Prev. 2015 Jul-Aug;39(4 Suppl 1):45-50.

PMID:26499415
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify those studies in which economic analysis of predictive genetic and pharmacogenetic testing programs have been carried out. Since the Italian National Prevention Plan 2014-2018 foresees the implementation of genetic testing for inherited breast cancer, special attention was given to the cost-effectiveness of BRCA1/2 testing programs.

METHODS

A systematic review of primary economic evaluations (EEs) of predictive genetic and pharmacogenetic testing programs and an overview of previously published systematic reviews of economic evaluations (ERs) was performed.

RESULTS

Overall 128 EEs and 11 ERs were identified. The methodological quality of both EEs and ERs was good on average. Both predictive genetic and pharmacogenetic testing programs were mainly concerned with oncological diseases. Seventeen percent of genetic testing programs are cost-saving, while a further 44% of cost/QALY ratios fall under the commonly used threshold of €37,000 per QALY. For BRCA1/2 testing, only cascade genetic screening programs, targeted to close relatives of carriers, show clear evidence of cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Despite some limitations, EEs and ERs are powerful tools that provide indications to policy-makers on which genetic testing programs might be introduced into health care systems and public health practice.

摘要

目标

确定那些对预测性基因检测和药物遗传学检测项目进行经济分析的研究。由于意大利2014 - 2018年国家预防计划预计将实施遗传性乳腺癌基因检测,因此特别关注BRCA1/2检测项目的成本效益。

方法

对预测性基因检测和药物遗传学检测项目的主要经济评估(EEs)进行系统评价,并对先前发表的经济评估系统评价(ERs)进行概述。

结果

共识别出128项EEs和11项ERs。EEs和ERs的方法学质量总体良好。预测性基因检测和药物遗传学检测项目主要涉及肿瘤疾病。17%的基因检测项目具有成本节约效益,另有44%的成本/质量调整生命年(QALY)比值低于常用的每QALY 37,000欧元的阈值。对于BRCA1/2检测,只有针对携带者近亲的级联基因筛查项目显示出明显的成本效益证据。

结论

尽管存在一些局限性,但EEs和ERs是强大的工具,可为政策制定者提供关于哪些基因检测项目可引入医疗保健系统和公共卫生实践的指示。

相似文献

1
Genetic testing and economic evaluations: a systematic review of the literature.基因检测与经济评估:文献系统综述
Epidemiol Prev. 2015 Jul-Aug;39(4 Suppl 1):45-50.
2
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.早期乳腺癌的激素疗法:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(26):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta11260.
7
Which BRCA genetic testing programs are ready for implementation in health care? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些BRCA基因检测项目已准备好在医疗保健中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2016 Dec;18(12):1171-1180. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.29. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Economic evaluation of personalised versus conventional risk assessment for women who have undergone testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer genes: a modelling study.针对已接受遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因检测的女性,个性化风险评估与传统风险评估的经济学评价:一项建模研究
J Med Genet. 2025 Jun 24;62(7):450-456. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2024-109948.
10
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancing pharmacogenetic testing in a tertiary hospital: a retrospective analysis after 10 years of activity.三级医院推进药物遗传学检测:10年活动后的回顾性分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1292416. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1292416. eCollection 2023.
2
Economic evaluations of predictive genetic testing: A scoping review.预测性基因检测的经济学评价:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0276572. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276572. eCollection 2023.
3
Research on the Economics of Cancer-Related Health Care: An Overview of the Review Literature.
癌症相关医疗保健的经济学研究:综述文献概述
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2022 Jul 5;2022(59):12-20. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac011.
4
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.评估精准医学的成本效益:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 5;12(4):e057537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057537.
5
A systematic review of the methodological quality of economic evaluations in genetic screening and testing for monogenic disorders.对单基因疾病遗传筛查和检测的经济评估方法学质量的系统评价。
Genet Med. 2022 Feb;24(2):262-288. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
6
Stakeholder attitudes towards establishing a national genomics registry of inherited cancer predisposition: a qualitative study.利益相关者对建立遗传性癌症易感性国家基因组登记处的态度:一项定性研究。
J Community Genet. 2022 Feb;13(1):59-73. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00559-8. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
7
Genetic testing for homologous recombination repair (HRR) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): challenges and solutions.转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)中同源重组修复(HRR)的基因检测:挑战与解决方案
Oncotarget. 2021 Aug 3;12(16):1600-1614. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28015.
8
Guidance for the Harmonisation and Improvement of Economic Evaluations of Personalised Medicine.个性化医学经济评估的协调与改进指南。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jul;39(7):771-788. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01010-z. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
9
Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.欧洲公共卫生专业人员的基因组学知识和态度:一项横断面调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230749. eCollection 2020.
10
Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: a scoping review.精准医学的成本效益:范围综述。
Int J Public Health. 2019 Dec;64(9):1261-1271. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01298-x. Epub 2019 Nov 15.