• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.欧洲公共卫生专业人员的基因组学知识和态度:一项横断面调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230749. eCollection 2020.
2
Are public health professionals prepared for public health genomics? A cross-sectional survey in Italy.公共卫生专业人员对公共卫生基因组学做好准备了吗?意大利的一项横断面调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 28;14:239. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-239.
3
Survey of Professionals of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) towards Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.欧洲公共卫生协会(EUPHA)专业人士对直接面向消费者的基因检测的看法调查。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):139-145. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac139.
4
Perceived utility and feasibility of pathogen genomics for public health practice: a survey among public health professionals working in the field of infectious diseases, Belgium, 2019.公众健康从业者对基于病原体基因组学的公共卫生实践的感知效用和可行性:比利时传染病领域公共卫生专业人员的调查,2019 年。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09428-4.
5
Community health professionals' dementia knowledge, attitudes and care approach: a cross-sectional survey in Changsha, China.社区卫生专业人员的痴呆症知识、态度和护理方法:中国长沙的横断面调查。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 May 25;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0821-4.
6
Attitudes, knowledge and behaviors related to evidence-based practice in health professionals involved in pain management.与疼痛管理相关的健康专业人员的循证实践的态度、知识和行为。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2018 Jun;16(2):107-118. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000131.
7
Knowledge, attitudes and preventive practices of primary health care professionals towards alcohol use: A national, cross-sectional study.初级卫生保健专业人员对饮酒的知识、态度和预防措施:一项全国性的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 13;14(5):e0216199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216199. eCollection 2019.
8
Health care professionals' attitudes towards population-based genetic testing and risk-stratification for ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional survey.医疗保健专业人员对基于人群的卵巢癌基因检测和风险分层的态度:一项横断面调查。
BMC Womens Health. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0488-6.
9
Health Care Provider Perceptions of Caring for Individuals with Inherited Pancreatic Cancer Risk.医疗保健提供者对照顾有遗传性胰腺癌风险个体的看法。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Feb;35(1):194-203. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01623-1.
10
Knowledge, Awareness, and Compliance of Disease Surveillance and Notification Among Jordanian Physicians in Residency Programs.约旦住院医师项目中医师对疾病监测与报告的知识、认知及依从性
Inquiry. 2019 Jan-Dec;56:46958019856508. doi: 10.1177/0046958019856508.

引用本文的文献

1
A qualitative study to evaluate the preparedness of community paediatricians for genomic medicine in England - ready for take-off?一项评估英国社区儿科医生对基因组医学准备情况的定性研究——准备好起飞了吗?
J Community Genet. 2025 Jun;16(3):321-334. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00781-8. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Genetic Screening-Emerging Issues.遗传筛查——新出现的问题。
Genes (Basel). 2024 May 3;15(5):581. doi: 10.3390/genes15050581.
3
Attitudes towards genetic testing: The role of genetic literacy, motivated cognition, and socio-demographic characteristics.对基因检测的态度:遗传素养、动机认知和社会人口特征的作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 15;18(11):e0293187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293187. eCollection 2023.
4
Survey of Professionals of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) towards Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing.欧洲公共卫生协会(EUPHA)专业人士对直接面向消费者的基因检测的看法调查。
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;33(1):139-145. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckac139.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Integrate Personalized Medicine into Prevention? Recommendations from the Personalized Prevention of Chronic Diseases (PRECeDI) Consortium.如何将个性化医疗融入预防?慢性病个性化预防(PRECeDI)联盟的建议。
Public Health Genomics. 2019;22(5-6):208-214. doi: 10.1159/000504652. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
Current Genetic Service Delivery Models for the Provision of Genetic Testing in Europe: A Systematic Review of the Literature.欧洲当前提供基因检测的基因服务提供模式:文献系统综述
Front Genet. 2019 Jun 19;10:552. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00552. eCollection 2019.
3
Core competencies in genetics for healthcare professionals: results from a literature review and a Delphi method.医疗保健专业人员遗传学核心能力:文献回顾和德尔菲法的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1456-7.
4
Offline: In defence of precision public health.线下:为精准公共卫生辩护。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32741-7.
5
"Precision" Public Health - Between Novelty and Hype.“精准”公共卫生——在新奇与炒作之间
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1398-1400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1806634. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature.遗传检测如何评估?文献系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 May;26(5):605-615. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0095-5. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
7
Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.患者对遗传信息的体验和利用:一项针对癌症易感性和血栓形成倾向检测患者的横断面研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;26(4):518-526. doi: 10.1038/s41431-017-0083-1. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
8
Which Lynch syndrome screening programs could be implemented in the "real world"? A systematic review of economic evaluations.哪些林奇综合征筛查方案可以在“现实世界”中实施?一项经济评估的系统综述。
Genet Med. 2018 Oct;20(10):1131-1144. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.244. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
9
From public health genomics to precision public health: a 20-year journey.从公共卫生基因组学到精准公共卫生:20 年的历程。
Genet Med. 2018 Jun;20(6):574-582. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.211. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
Identification of Delivery Models for the Provision of Predictive Genetic Testing in Europe: Protocol for a Multicentre Qualitative Study and a Systematic Review of the Literature.欧洲提供预测性基因检测的交付模式识别:多中心定性研究方案及文献系统综述
Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 22;5:223. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00223. eCollection 2017.

欧洲公共卫生专业人员的基因组学知识和态度:一项横断面调查的结果。

Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Local Health Unit-Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 2, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230749. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230749
PMID:32240206
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7117699/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The international public health (PH) community is debating the opportunity to incorporate genomic technologies into PH practice. A survey was conducted to assess attitudes of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) members towards their role in the implementation of public health genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services.

METHODS

EUPHA members were invited via monthly newsletter and e-mail to take part in an online survey from February 2017 to January 2018. A descriptive analysis of knowledge and attitudes was conducted, along with a univariate and multivariate analysis of their determinants.

RESULTS

Five hundred and two people completed the questionnaire, 17.9% were involved in PHG activities. Only 28.9% correctly identified all medical conditions for which there is (or not) evidence for implementing genetic testing; over 60% thought that investing in genomics may divert economic resources from social and environmental determinants of health. The majority agreed that PH professionals may play different roles in incorporating genomics into their activities. Better knowledge was associated with positive attitudes towards the use of genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services in PH (OR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.01-2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed quite positive attitudes, but also a need to increase awareness on genomics among European PH professionals. Those directly involved in PHG activities tend to have a more positive attitude and better knowledge; however, gaps are also evident in this group, suggesting the need to harmonize practice and encourage greater exchange of knowledge among professionals.

摘要

背景

国际公共卫生(PH)界正在讨论将基因组技术纳入 PH 实践的机会。进行了一项调查,以评估欧洲公共卫生协会(EUPHA)成员对其在实施公共卫生基因组学(PHG)方面的作用的态度,以及他们对遗传检测和遗传服务提供的知识和态度。

方法

通过每月的通讯和电子邮件邀请 EUPHA 成员参加 2017 年 2 月至 2018 年 1 月的在线调查。对知识和态度进行描述性分析,并对其决定因素进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

502 人完成了问卷,17.9%的人参与了 PHG 活动。只有 28.9%的人正确识别了所有有(或没有)证据实施遗传检测的医疗条件;超过 60%的人认为投资于基因组学可能会将经济资源从社会和环境健康决定因素转移走。大多数人认为 PH 专业人员在将基因组学纳入其活动中可能扮演不同的角色。更好的知识与在 PH 中使用遗传检测和提供遗传服务的积极态度相关(OR = 1.48;95%CI 1.01-2.18)。

结论

我们的研究表明,态度相当积极,但欧洲 PH 专业人员也需要提高对基因组学的认识。那些直接参与 PHG 活动的人往往具有更积极的态度和更好的知识;然而,在这个群体中也存在明显的差距,这表明需要协调实践,并鼓励专业人员之间更多地交流知识。