Suppr超能文献

欧洲公共卫生专业人员的基因组学知识和态度:一项横断面调查的结果。

Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Local Health Unit-Azienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 2, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230749. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The international public health (PH) community is debating the opportunity to incorporate genomic technologies into PH practice. A survey was conducted to assess attitudes of the European Public Health Association (EUPHA) members towards their role in the implementation of public health genomics (PHG), and their knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services.

METHODS

EUPHA members were invited via monthly newsletter and e-mail to take part in an online survey from February 2017 to January 2018. A descriptive analysis of knowledge and attitudes was conducted, along with a univariate and multivariate analysis of their determinants.

RESULTS

Five hundred and two people completed the questionnaire, 17.9% were involved in PHG activities. Only 28.9% correctly identified all medical conditions for which there is (or not) evidence for implementing genetic testing; over 60% thought that investing in genomics may divert economic resources from social and environmental determinants of health. The majority agreed that PH professionals may play different roles in incorporating genomics into their activities. Better knowledge was associated with positive attitudes towards the use of genetic testing and the delivery of genetic services in PH (OR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.01-2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed quite positive attitudes, but also a need to increase awareness on genomics among European PH professionals. Those directly involved in PHG activities tend to have a more positive attitude and better knowledge; however, gaps are also evident in this group, suggesting the need to harmonize practice and encourage greater exchange of knowledge among professionals.

摘要

背景

国际公共卫生(PH)界正在讨论将基因组技术纳入 PH 实践的机会。进行了一项调查,以评估欧洲公共卫生协会(EUPHA)成员对其在实施公共卫生基因组学(PHG)方面的作用的态度,以及他们对遗传检测和遗传服务提供的知识和态度。

方法

通过每月的通讯和电子邮件邀请 EUPHA 成员参加 2017 年 2 月至 2018 年 1 月的在线调查。对知识和态度进行描述性分析,并对其决定因素进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

502 人完成了问卷,17.9%的人参与了 PHG 活动。只有 28.9%的人正确识别了所有有(或没有)证据实施遗传检测的医疗条件;超过 60%的人认为投资于基因组学可能会将经济资源从社会和环境健康决定因素转移走。大多数人认为 PH 专业人员在将基因组学纳入其活动中可能扮演不同的角色。更好的知识与在 PH 中使用遗传检测和提供遗传服务的积极态度相关(OR = 1.48;95%CI 1.01-2.18)。

结论

我们的研究表明,态度相当积极,但欧洲 PH 专业人员也需要提高对基因组学的认识。那些直接参与 PHG 活动的人往往具有更积极的态度和更好的知识;然而,在这个群体中也存在明显的差距,这表明需要协调实践,并鼓励专业人员之间更多地交流知识。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Offline: In defence of precision public health.线下:为精准公共卫生辩护。
Lancet. 2018 Oct 27;392(10157):1504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32741-7.
5
"Precision" Public Health - Between Novelty and Hype.“精准”公共卫生——在新奇与炒作之间
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1398-1400. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1806634. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature.遗传检测如何评估?文献系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 May;26(5):605-615. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0095-5. Epub 2018 Feb 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验