Reinhardt M, Schlögl M, Bonfiglio S, Votruba S B, Krakoff J, Thearle M S
Department of Health and Human Services, Obesity and Diabetes Clinical Research Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 May;40(5):754-60. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2015.229. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In small studies, a thrifty human phenotype, defined by a greater 24-hour energy expenditure (EE) decrease with fasting, is associated with less weight loss during caloric restriction. In rodents, models of diet-induced obesity often have a phenotype including a reduced EE and decreased core body temperature. We assessed whether a thrifty human phenotype associates with differences in core body temperature or body composition.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Data for this cross-sectional analysis were obtained from 77 individuals participating in one of two normal physiology studies while housed on our clinical research unit. Twenty-four-hour EE using a whole-room indirect calorimeter and 24-h core body temperature were measured during 24 h each of fasting and 200% overfeeding with a diet consisting of 50% carbohydrates, 20% protein and 30% fat. Body composition was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. To account for the effects of body size on EE, changes in EE were expressed as a percentage change from 24-hour EE (%EE) during energy balance.
A greater %EE decrease with fasting correlated with a smaller %EE increase with overfeeding (r=0.27, P=0.02). The %EE decrease with fasting was associated with both fat mass and abdominal fat mass, even after accounting for covariates (β=-0.16 (95% CI: -0.26, -0.06) %EE per kg fat mass, P=0.003; β=-0.0004 (-0.0007, -0.00004) %EE kg(-1) abdominal fat mass, P=0.03). In men, a greater %EE decrease in response to fasting was associated with a lower 24- h core body temperature, even after adjusting for covariates (β=1.43 (0.72, 2.15) %EE per 0.1 °C, P=0.0003).
Thrifty individuals, as defined by a larger EE decrease with fasting, were more likely to have greater overall and abdominal adiposity as well as lower core body temperature consistent with a more efficient metabolism.
背景/目的:在小型研究中,一种节俭的人类表型,其定义为禁食期间24小时能量消耗(EE)下降幅度更大,与热量限制期间体重减轻较少相关。在啮齿动物中,饮食诱导肥胖模型通常具有包括EE降低和核心体温下降的表型。我们评估了节俭的人类表型是否与核心体温或身体成分的差异相关。
受试者/方法:本横断面分析的数据来自77名参与两项正常生理学研究之一的个体,他们居住在我们的临床研究单元。使用全室间接热量计测量24小时EE,并在禁食24小时和以由50%碳水化合物、20%蛋白质和30%脂肪组成的饮食进行200%过量喂养的24小时期间测量24小时核心体温。通过双能X线吸收法测量身体成分。为了考虑身体大小对EE的影响,EE的变化表示为能量平衡期间相对于24小时EE(%EE)的百分比变化。
禁食时更大的%EE下降与过量喂养时更小的%EE增加相关(r = 0.27,P = 0.02)。即使在考虑协变量后,禁食时%EE的下降也与脂肪量和腹部脂肪量相关(每千克脂肪量的β=-0.16(95%CI:-0.26,-0.06)%EE,P = 0.003;每千克腹部脂肪量的β=-0.0004(-0.0007,-0.00004)%EE,P = 0.03)。在男性中,即使在调整协变量后,对禁食反应时更大的%EE下降也与较低的24小时核心体温相关(每0.1°C的β = 1.43(0.72,2.15)%EE,P = 0.0003)。
以禁食时EE下降幅度更大定义的节俭个体更有可能具有更高的总体和腹部肥胖以及更低的核心体温,这与更有效的新陈代谢一致。