Schmoll H J
Hannover University Medical School, Division of Hematology/Oncology, FRG.
Semin Oncol. 1989 Feb;16(1 Suppl 3):82-95.
Ifosfamide is one of the most active agents in testicular cancer, with a single-agent activity of 66% in untreated and 21% in cisplatin-pretreated patients. The antitumor effect is comparable in nonseminoma and seminoma. The 23% complete response (CR) rate in patients not pretreated with cisplatin is lower than for those pretreated with cisplatin. This indicates that ifosfamide is less active than cisplatin, and more active than bleomycin, the vinca alkaloids, and possibly etoposide. Ifosfamide and cisplatin are not cross-resistant, with a 67% response rate for cisplatin in ifosfamide-pretreated patients. In a prospective, randomized trial with 203 patients from 1978 to 1982, no significant survival advantage could be seen for PVB (cisplatin, vinblastine, bleomycin) plus ifosfamide v PVB after a 10-year follow-up. In patients refractory to or progressing with cisplatin treatment, ifosfamide-containing regimens rarely induce either partial responses (PRs) or CR. However, in patients relapsing or progressing after a favorable response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, ifosfamide seems to potentiate the activity of cisplatin and etoposide therapy with about 30% CRs and 15% to 20% long-term, disease-free survivors. This can be explained by the synergism demonstrated in preclinical trials among these three drugs. Due to this high activity in relapsing patients, the cisplatin-etoposide-ifosfamide combination is currently being investigated as first-line treatment in poor risk testicular cancer patients. The optimal dose and schedule still have to be determined, particularly in the combination with granulocyte-granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors that may allow dose escalation of these drugs. An important result of the 15-year follow-up of ifosamide in first-line treatment is the absence of late organ toxicity and particularly of secondary malignancies (1/331 patients) in this young patient population.
异环磷酰胺是睾丸癌中最有效的药物之一,在未经治疗的患者中,其单药活性为66%,在顺铂预处理的患者中为21%。在非精原细胞瘤和精原细胞瘤中,其抗肿瘤效果相当。未接受顺铂预处理的患者中23%的完全缓解(CR)率低于接受顺铂预处理的患者。这表明异环磷酰胺的活性低于顺铂,但高于博来霉素、长春花生物碱以及可能的依托泊苷。异环磷酰胺和顺铂不存在交叉耐药性,在异环磷酰胺预处理的患者中,顺铂的缓解率为67%。在1978年至1982年对203例患者进行的一项前瞻性随机试验中,经过10年随访,PVB(顺铂、长春碱、博来霉素)加异环磷酰胺与PVB相比,未观察到显著的生存优势。在对顺铂治疗难治或病情进展的患者中,含异环磷酰胺的方案很少能诱导部分缓解(PRs)或CR。然而,在对基于顺铂的化疗有良好反应后复发或病情进展的患者中,异环磷酰胺似乎能增强顺铂和依托泊苷治疗的活性,约30%的患者达到CR,15%至20%的患者长期无病生存。这可以通过这三种药物在临床前试验中显示的协同作用来解释。由于在复发患者中具有高活性,顺铂-依托泊苷-异环磷酰胺联合方案目前正在作为高危睾丸癌患者的一线治疗进行研究。最佳剂量和给药方案仍有待确定,特别是在与粒细胞-粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子联合使用时,这可能允许这些药物剂量增加。对一线治疗中异环磷酰胺进行15年随访的一个重要结果是,在这个年轻患者群体中未出现晚期器官毒性,尤其是继发性恶性肿瘤(331例患者中有1例)。