• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肿瘤学家对复发性卵巢癌患者参与治疗决策偏好的看法以及在何时及如何让患者参与这一过程的策略。

Oncologists' Perceptions of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients' Preference for Participation in Treatment Decision Making and Strategies for When and How to Involve Patients in This Process.

作者信息

Elit Laurie, Charles Cathy A, Gafni Amiram

机构信息

Departments of *Obstetrics and Gynecology and †Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and ‡Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Nov;25(9):1717-23. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000548.

DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000000548
PMID:26501437
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The treatment decision-making (TDM) process in the medical encounter in ovarian cancer (OC) is directed by oncologists. There is little information on oncologists' perceptions of this process. Our objectives were to explore oncologists' perceptions concerning (1) patients' preference for involvement in TDM, (2) factors that affect when to introduce this discussion, and (3) strategies used for engaging women in TDM.

METHODS

We adopted a qualitative descriptive approach. Individual in-person interviews were used to collect data; themes were identified.

RESULTS

Fifteen gynecologic and 5 medical oncologists from Ontario, Canada, participated. We found that oncologists made the assumption that women with recurrent OC were interested in being involved in TDM but rarely reported attempting to validate this assumption. The oncologists timed the initiation of the TDM discussion based on their degree of certainty of recurrent OC and their perception of the patient's readiness to be involved in TDM. Oncologists reported using strategies to engage women such as getting the women to take ownership of the decision, verbalize their priorities, lead the discussions, and giving the opportunity to gather information.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologists need to listen to each patient rather than make assumptions about the person based on her disease.

摘要

目的

卵巢癌(OC)医疗会诊中的治疗决策制定(TDM)过程由肿瘤学家主导。关于肿瘤学家对这一过程的看法,相关信息较少。我们的目的是探讨肿瘤学家对以下方面的看法:(1)患者参与TDM的偏好;(2)影响何时引入该讨论的因素;(3)促使女性参与TDM所采用的策略。

方法

我们采用定性描述性方法。通过个人面对面访谈收集数据;确定主题。

结果

来自加拿大安大略省的15名妇科肿瘤学家和5名医学肿瘤学家参与了研究。我们发现,肿瘤学家认为复发性OC女性有兴趣参与TDM,但很少报告尝试验证这一假设。肿瘤学家根据对复发性OC的确定程度以及对患者参与TDM准备情况的认知来确定TDM讨论的起始时间。肿瘤学家报告说,他们采用了一些策略来促使女性参与,比如让女性对决策负责、说出自己的优先事项、主导讨论以及提供收集信息的机会。

结论

肿瘤学家需要倾听每位患者的意见,而不是基于患者的疾病对其进行假设。

相似文献

1
Oncologists' Perceptions of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer Patients' Preference for Participation in Treatment Decision Making and Strategies for When and How to Involve Patients in This Process.肿瘤学家对复发性卵巢癌患者参与治疗决策偏好的看法以及在何时及如何让患者参与这一过程的策略。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Nov;25(9):1717-23. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000548.
2
How oncologists communicate information to women with recurrent ovarian cancer in the context of treatment decision making in the medical encounter.肿瘤学家在医疗问诊中的治疗决策背景下,如何向复发性卵巢癌女性传达信息。
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):1066-80. doi: 10.1111/hex.12079. Epub 2013 May 13.
3
Walking a tightrope: oncologists' perspective on providing information to women with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) during the medical encounter.走钢丝:肿瘤学家在医疗就诊期间为复发性卵巢癌(ROC)女性提供信息的观点。
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Oct;20(10):2327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1344-0. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
4
It's a choice to move forward: women's perceptions about treatment decision making in recurrent ovarian cancer.向前迈进是一种选择:女性对复发性卵巢癌治疗决策的看法。
Psychooncology. 2010 Mar;19(3):318-25. doi: 10.1002/pon.1562.
5
Women's perceptions of their treatment decision-making about breast cancer treatment.女性对其乳腺癌治疗决策的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Dec;73(3):431-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.015. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
6
"Often Relatives are the Key […]" -Family Involvement in Treatment Decision Making in Patients with Advanced Cancer Near the End of Life.“亲属往往是关键因素[…]”——晚期癌症临终患者治疗决策中的家庭参与
Oncologist. 2021 May;26(5):e831-e837. doi: 10.1002/onco.13557. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
7
Conveying genomic recurrence risk estimates to patients with early-stage breast cancer: oncologist perspectives.向早期乳腺癌患者传递基因组复发风险估计:肿瘤学家的观点。
Psychooncology. 2013 Sep;22(9):2110-6. doi: 10.1002/pon.3264. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
Are those all my options? Evaluating oncologists' communication strategies in treatment and clinical trial discussions by race and gender.这些就是我所有的选择吗?评估肿瘤学家在治疗及临床试验讨论中按种族和性别采用的沟通策略。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Apr 26;33(5):425. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09491-w.
9
The effect of priority setting decisions for new cancer drugs on medical oncologists' practice in Ontario: a qualitative study.安大略省新癌症药物优先级设定决策对肿瘤内科医生临床实践的影响:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Nov 28;7:193. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-193.
10
Patients' and oncologists' views on how oncologists may best address patients' emotions during consultations: An interview study.患者和肿瘤医生对肿瘤医生在咨询中如何最好地处理患者情绪的看法:一项访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jul;101(7):1223-1231. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.02.012. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' and Clinicians' Perceptions of Clinician-Expressed Empathy in Advanced Cancer Consultations and Associations with Patient Outcomes.患者与临床医生对晚期癌症会诊中临床医生所表达同理心的认知及其与患者预后的关联
Palliat Med Rep. 2020 Jun 11;1(1):76-83. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0052. eCollection 2020.
2
Patients' preferred and perceived level of involvement in decision making for cancer treatment: A systematic review.患者对癌症治疗决策的偏好和感知参与度:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2021 Oct;30(10):1663-1679. doi: 10.1002/pon.5750. Epub 2021 Jun 28.