Veterans Affairs Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont2Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire4The Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
JAMA Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):247-55. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3592.
Protamine sulfate can be administered at the conclusion of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to reverse the anticoagulant effects of heparin and to limit the risk for postoperative bleeding. Protamine use remains controversial owing to concern for increased thrombotic complications with its use.
To review the evidence for and against protamine use, both in its association with increased thrombotic complications and with decreased bleeding.
We searched Medline (1946-2014), EMBASE (1966-2014), Cochrane Library (1972-2014), clinical trial registries (World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry and clinicaltrials.gov), and abstracts from conferences of the Society of Vascular Surgery (2002-2014) and American Heart Association Scientific Sessions (1980-2014) in November 2014. No language restrictions were applied.
We included clinical trials and observational studies comparing reversal of heparin with protamine sulfate vs no reversal in patients undergoing carotid revascularization and reporting stroke during hospitalization. Of 360 records screened, 12 studies (3%) of CEA were eligible for data pooling.
Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality. Random-effects models were used to summarize relative risks (RRs).
Stroke after CEA.
We included 12 observational studies involving 10,621 patients in the meta-analysis. Event rates did not differ significantly between patients who received protamine vs those who did not for the following outcomes: stroke (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.55-1.29; I(2) = 15%; 9 studies), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.53-1.51; I(2) = 0%; 3 studies), or mortality (RR, 0.9, 95% CI, 0.62-1.29; I(2) = 0%; 7 studies). The use of protamine was associated with a significant decrease in major bleeding complications requiring reoperation (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; I(2) = 32%; 10 studies).
Based on available evidence, the use of protamine following CEA is associated with a reduction in bleeding complications, without increasing major thrombotic outcomes, including stroke, myocardial infarction, or death.
在颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)结束时,可以给予硫酸鱼精蛋白以逆转肝素的抗凝作用,并限制术后出血的风险。由于担心使用鱼精蛋白会增加血栓并发症,因此其使用仍然存在争议。
综述鱼精蛋白使用的证据,包括其与血栓并发症增加和出血减少的关系。
我们检索了 Medline(1946-2014 年)、EMBASE(1966-2014 年)、Cochrane 图书馆(1972-2014 年)、临床试验注册处(世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台和 clinicaltrials.gov),以及 2014 年 11 月血管外科学会(2002-2014 年)和美国心脏协会科学会议(1980-2014 年)的会议摘要。未对语言进行限制。
我们纳入了比较颈动脉血运重建术后使用硫酸鱼精蛋白逆转肝素与不逆转肝素,并报告住院期间卒中的临床试验和观察性研究。在筛选的 360 份记录中,有 12 项 CEA 的研究(3%)符合数据合并条件。
两名评审员提取数据并评估质量。使用随机效应模型汇总相对风险(RR)。
CEA 后的卒中。
我们纳入了 12 项涉及 10621 例患者的观察性研究进行荟萃分析。在以下结局中,接受鱼精蛋白和未接受鱼精蛋白的患者之间的事件发生率无显著差异:卒中(RR,0.84;95%CI,0.55-1.29;I²=15%;9 项研究)、心肌梗死(RR,0.89;95%CI,0.53-1.51;I²=0%;3 项研究)或死亡率(RR,0.9,95%CI,0.62-1.29;I²=0%;7 项研究)。鱼精蛋白的使用与需要再次手术的主要出血并发症减少相关(RR,0.57;95%CI,0.39-0.84;I²=32%;10 项研究)。
根据现有证据,CEA 后使用鱼精蛋白与减少出血并发症相关,而不会增加主要血栓并发症,包括卒中、心肌梗死或死亡。