Malhotra Chetna, Chan Noreen, Zhou Jamie, Dalager Hannah B, Finkelstein Eric
Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore, 169857, Singapore.
Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Oct 26;14:52. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0050-y.
There is high variability in end-of-life (EOL) treatments. Some of this could be due to differences in physician treatment recommendations, their knowledge/attitude regarding palliative care, and their perceived roles in treating patients with advanced serious illness (ASI). Thus, the objective of this paper was to identify potential variation in physician recommendations, their knowledge/attitude regarding palliative care and perceived roles in treating ASI patients.
A cross-sectional survey consisting of vignettes describing patient characteristics that varied by age, expected survival, cognitive status and treatment costs and asked physicians whether they would recommend life-extending treatments for each scenario, was administered to 285 physicians who treat ASI patients in Singapore. Physicians were also assessed on their knowledge/attitude in palliative care. They were administered a best-worst scaling exercise requiring them to select their most and least important role as a physician caring for an ASI patient.
There was a wide variation in physician recommendations for life-extending treatments for patients with similar profiles, which can partly be attributed to physician characteristics (years of experience and place of training). Only about one-fourth of the physicians answered all knowledge/attitude questions correctly. Statements assessing knowledge/attitude regarding pain management had the fewest correct responses. The most important perceived role regarding provision of EOL care concerned symptom management.
Results suggest that variation in physician treatment recommendations may be partly related to their own characteristics, raising concerns regarding the EOL care being provided to patients. Efforts should be made to better understand this variation and to provide the physicians with additional training in key aspects of palliative care management.
临终治疗存在很大差异。其中一些差异可能归因于医生的治疗建议不同、他们对姑息治疗的知识/态度以及他们在治疗晚期重症患者(ASI)中所感知到的角色。因此,本文的目的是确定医生建议的潜在差异、他们对姑息治疗的知识/态度以及在治疗ASI患者中所感知到的角色。
对新加坡285名治疗ASI患者的医生进行了一项横断面调查,该调查由描述患者特征(年龄、预期生存期、认知状态和治疗费用)各不相同的病例 vignettes 组成,并询问医生对于每种情况是否会推荐延长生命的治疗方法。还评估了医生对姑息治疗的知识/态度。对他们进行了最佳-最差排序练习,要求他们选择作为照顾ASI患者的医生最重要和最不重要的角色。
对于具有相似特征的患者,医生在延长生命治疗的建议上存在很大差异,这部分可归因于医生的特征(经验年限和培训地点)。只有约四分之一的医生正确回答了所有知识/态度问题。评估疼痛管理知识/态度的陈述正确回答最少。在提供临终关怀方面,最重要的感知角色涉及症状管理。
结果表明,医生治疗建议的差异可能部分与其自身特征有关,这引发了对为患者提供的临终关怀的担忧。应努力更好地理解这种差异,并为医生提供姑息治疗管理关键方面的额外培训。